Abstract
Recent United States Congress legislation (the WARN Act of 1988) mandates that organizations must provide at least 60 days notice before a layoff of 50 or more employees can be instituted. As a consequence, individuals who are notified of their layoff often remain in their jobs for a significant period of time-and managers hope that these people will be good “organizational citizens” during thisremaining time. This article identifies different psychological factors that could explain why individuals would remain good citizens, even after notification of their impending termination. In a survey of 147 skilled employees who received notification of their layoffs, we found that the perceived fairness of the layoff process was the primary factor influencing their citizenship behavior. Additional analyses suggested that the perceived adequacy of the explanation of the layoffs, and whether the layoff victims were treated with respect and dignity, were the primary factors influencing the perceived fairness of the layoff process. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.
Aram, J. D., & Salipante, P. F., Jr. (1981). An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict.Academy of Management Review, 6, 197–204.
Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9), 289–319. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bies, R. J. (1989). [Review ofOrganizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome]. Academy of Management Review, 14, 294–297.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., & Bazerman, B. H. (Eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1), 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676–685.
Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault?Communication Research, 15, 381–399.
Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research theory, and practice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 213–255.
Brockner, J. (1990). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research theory, and practice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10), 213–255. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In Carroll, J. S. (Ed.)Advances in Applied Social Psychology: Business Settings, 45–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.Journal of Management, 16, 705–721.
Feldman, D. C., & Leana, C. R. (1989). Managing layoffs: Experiences at the Challenger disaster site and the Pittsburgh steel mills.Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 52–64.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.
Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79–90.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled dissent: A theoretical essay. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Greenberg, J. (1990a). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12), 111–157. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.
Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (Ed.),Basic Group Processes, 235–256. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
Jahoda, M. (1982).Employment and Unemployment: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Leana, C. R., & Feldman, D. C. (1988). Individual responses to job loss: Perceptions, reactions, and coping behaviors.Journal of Management, 14, 375–389.
Leana, C. R., & Feldman, D. C. (1990). Individual responses to job loss: Empirical findings from two field studies.Human Relations, 43, 1155–1181.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, 27–55. New York: Plenum.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Martin, C. L. (1988). Distributive and procedural justice: Effects on satisfaction and commitment: In Ray, D. (Ed.),Proceeding. Mississippi State, Mississippi: Southern Management Association.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1991).Fairness in performance monitoring: The role of justice mediating the relationship between monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Organ, D. W. (1988).Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12), 43–72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164.
Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1992).Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Porter, L., & Lawler, E. E. (1968).Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959).The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
Tyler, T. R. (1990).Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Bies, B. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. S. (Ed.)Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, 77–98. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.
Weber, A. R., & Taylor, D. P. (1963). Procedures for employee displacement: Advance notice of plant shutdown.Journal of Business, 36, 312–315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bies, R.J., Martin, C.L. & Brockner, J. Just laid off, but still a “good citizen?” only if the process is fair. Employ Respons Rights J 6, 227–238 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419446
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419446