Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Just laid off, but still a “good citizen?” only if the process is fair

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent United States Congress legislation (the WARN Act of 1988) mandates that organizations must provide at least 60 days notice before a layoff of 50 or more employees can be instituted. As a consequence, individuals who are notified of their layoff often remain in their jobs for a significant period of time-and managers hope that these people will be good “organizational citizens” during thisremaining time. This article identifies different psychological factors that could explain why individuals would remain good citizens, even after notification of their impending termination. In a survey of 147 skilled employees who received notification of their layoffs, we found that the perceived fairness of the layoff process was the primary factor influencing their citizenship behavior. Additional analyses suggested that the perceived adequacy of the explanation of the layoffs, and whether the layoff victims were treated with respect and dignity, were the primary factors influencing the perceived fairness of the layoff process. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aram, J. D., & Salipante, P. F., Jr. (1981). An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict.Academy of Management Review, 6, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9), 289–319. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1989). [Review ofOrganizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome]. Academy of Management Review, 14, 294–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., & Bazerman, B. H. (Eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1), 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault?Communication Research, 15, 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research theory, and practice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 213–255.

  • Brockner, J. (1990). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research theory, and practice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10), 213–255. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In Carroll, J. S. (Ed.)Advances in Applied Social Psychology: Business Settings, 45–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.Journal of Management, 16, 705–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C., & Leana, C. R. (1989). Managing layoffs: Experiences at the Challenger disaster site and the Pittsburgh steel mills.Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled dissent: A theoretical essay. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12), 111–157. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (Ed.),Basic Group Processes, 235–256. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1982).Employment and Unemployment: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. R., & Feldman, D. C. (1988). Individual responses to job loss: Perceptions, reactions, and coping behaviors.Journal of Management, 14, 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. R., & Feldman, D. C. (1990). Individual responses to job loss: Empirical findings from two field studies.Human Relations, 43, 1155–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, 27–55. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L. (1988). Distributive and procedural justice: Effects on satisfaction and commitment: In Ray, D. (Ed.),Proceeding. Mississippi State, Mississippi: Southern Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1991).Fairness in performance monitoring: The role of justice mediating the relationship between monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Organ, D. W. (1988).Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12), 43–72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1992).Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Porter, L., & Lawler, E. E. (1968).Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959).The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990).Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Bies, B. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. S. (Ed.)Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, 77–98. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. R., & Taylor, D. P. (1963). Procedures for employee displacement: Advance notice of plant shutdown.Journal of Business, 36, 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bies, R.J., Martin, C.L. & Brockner, J. Just laid off, but still a “good citizen?” only if the process is fair. Employ Respons Rights J 6, 227–238 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419446

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419446

Key Words

Navigation