Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria

• Agar, M. (1986). Speaking of Ethnography. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Barley, S. (1986). “Technology as an occasion for structuring” evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.”Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 78–108.

  Google Scholar 

• Becker, H. (1970). Sociological Work: Method and Substance. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.

  Google Scholar 

• Blumer, H. (1931). “Science without concepts.”American Journal of Sociology 36, 515–533.

  Google Scholar 

• Burgess, R. (ed.) (1982).Field Research: A Source Book and Field Manual. London: George Allen and Unwin.

  Google Scholar 

• Charmaz, K. (1983). “The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation.” In R. Emerson (ed.)Contemporary Field Research. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 109–126.

  Google Scholar 

• Dewey, J. (1916).Essays in Experimental Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and Nature Chicago: Open Court. Fielding, N. and Fielding J. 1986.Linking Data. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, B. (1978).Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

  Google Scholar 

• Gortner, S., and Schultz, P. (1988). “Approaches to nursing science methods.”Image 20, 22–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Hammersley, M., and Atkinson, P. (1983).Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock.

  Google Scholar 

• Hughes, E. (1971).The Sociological Eye. Chicago: Aldine, 1971. Reprinted, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction, 1987.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, J. (1975).Doing Field Research. N.Y.: Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kidder, L. (1981). “Qualitative research and quasi-experimental frameworks.” In M. Brewer and B. Collings (eds.).Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirk, J. and Miller, M. (1986).Reliability, Validity and Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, T. (1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Le Compte, N., and Goetz, J. (1982). “Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research.”Review of Educational Research 52, 31–60.

  Google Scholar 

• Mead, George H. (1934).Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Park, R., and Burgess, E. (1921).An Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Popper, K. (1959).The Logic of Scientific Discovery. N.Y.: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Sandelowski, M. (1986). “The problem of rigor in qualitative research.”Advances in Nursing Science.8, 27–37.

  Google Scholar 

• Strauss, A. (1970). “Discovering New Theory from Previous Theory.” In T. Shibutani (ed.)Human Nature and Collective Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Strauss, A. (1987).Qualitative Analysis. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990).Basic of Grounded Theory Methods. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1989). “Tracing Lines of Conditional Influence: Matrix and Paths.” Paper delivered at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Society, San Francisco, California, August 13.

• Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., and Wiener, C. (1985).The Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago: University of Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

Download references