Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Memory for action events: A new field of research

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bäckman, L. (1985). Compensation and recoding: A framework for aging and memory research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L. (1985). Further evidence for the lack of adult age differences on free recall of subject-performed tasks: The importance of motor acction. Human Learning, 4, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule. Human Learning, 3, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L. G. Nilsson & T. Archer, Animal learning and human memory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Richardson, T. E. (1988) (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1985). Aktivationsprozesse im motorischen Gedächtnis. In D. Albert (Ed.) Bericht über den 34. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Wien. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1986(a)). Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects. Psychological Research, 48, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1986(b)). Differences between imaginal and motor encoding. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1987). Modalitätsspezifische Gedächtnissysteme im Kontext sprachlicher Informationsverarbeitung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 195, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp J. (1989). Sind motorische Prozesse Teil des Enkodierens? In W. Schönpflug, Bericht über den 36. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Berlin 1988. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27, 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1983). Zum Einfluß von Wahrnehmen und Tun auf das Behalten von Verb-Objekt-Phrasen. Sprache & Kognition, 2, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit. Psychological Research, 46, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory. German Journal of Psychology, 9, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Denis, M. (1989). Paired associate learning of action verbs with visual or motor imaginal encoding instructions. Psychological Research, 50, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (1988) (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: current research and issues, Vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1986). Separate memory laws for recall of performed acts? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 27, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup T. (1989). Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs. Psychological Research, 50, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1969). The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H., & Hakami, M. K. (1983). Memory for activities: Adult age differences and intentionality. Developmental Psychology, 19, 889–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H., Lichty, W., & Davis, R. T. (1985). Temporal memory for performed activities: Intentionality and adult age differences. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1132–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopf, M., & Neidhardt, E. (1989). Gedächtnis für Handlungen. Sprache & Kognition (in press).

  • Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Lollis, T. (1988). Qualitative and quantitative considerations in encoding difficulty effect. Memory & Cognition, 16, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. G., & Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 427–432). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrig, W. (1988). Image versus motor encoding. In M. Denis, J. Engelkamp, & T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery (pp. 307–316). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz E. (1988). The role of motoric enactment (M-processing) in memory for words and sentences. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.). Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz E., & Dixon D. (1982). Let's pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippich, W., Peter, H. J., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (1987). Vorstellungsprozesse beim Buchstabieren: Implizite und explizite Erfahrungsnachwirkungen einen Tag später. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 34, 649–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippich, W., Schumacher, S., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (1987). Implizite und explizite Erinnerungen: Wort- und Bedeutungsvorstellungen beim Buchstabieren und Wiedererkennen. Archiv für Psychologie, 139, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Enkodierung, Rekodierung, Retrieval und die Aktivation motorischer Programme (Arbeiten der FR Psychologie, No. 91). Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Die Differenzierung sprachlicher Bedeutung durch die Aktivation motorischer Komponenten. In D. Albert (Ed.), Bericht über den 34. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Wien (pp. 234–237). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1986). The memory trace of semantic or motor processing. In F. Klix, & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 215–223). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1987). Argumente für ein motorisches Gedächtnissystem. In J. Engelkamp, K. Lorenz, & B. Sandig (Eds.), Wissensrepräsentation und Wissensaustausch (pp. 49–72). St Ingbert: Röhrig-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und Ausführungsanteile motorischer Gedächtniskomponenten und ihre Wirkung auf das Behalten ihrer verbalen Bezeichnungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 379–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components. Acta Psychologica, 58, 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989) One, two, or three memories: Some comments and new findings. Acta Psychologica, 70, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., Engelkamp, J., Mohr, M., & Mohr, G. (1988). Organisation und Behalten im multimodalen Modell (Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie der Universität des Saarlandes, No. 125). Saarbrücken: Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., Engelkamp, J., & Sieloff, U. (1984). Motorische Gedächtniskomponenten als partiell unabhängige Komponenten des Engramms verbaler Handlungsbeschreibungen. Sprache & Kognition, 3, 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H.D. Memory for action events: A new field of research. Psychol. Res 51, 153–157 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309142

Navigation