Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs

1. Ernest W. Adams, The Logic of Conditionals, D. Reidel Dordrecht, 1975.

   Google Scholar 

2. Carlos Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50: 510–530, 1985.

   Google Scholar 

3. Carlos Alchourón and David Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Safe contraction. Studia Logica, 44(4): 405–422, 1985.

   Google Scholar 

4. Craig Boutilier. Inaccessible worlds and irrelevance: Preliminary report. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Inteligence, pages 413–418, Sydney, 1991.

5. Craig, Boutilier. Epistemic entrenchment in autoepistemic logic Fundamenta Informaticae, 17(1–2): 5–30, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

6. Craig Boutilier Sequences of revisions: On the semantics of nested conditionals. Technical Report 92–24, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

7. Craig Boutilier. The probability of a possibility: Adding uncertainly to default rules. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Al, pages 461–468. Washington, D.C. 1993.

8. Craig Boutilier. Conditional logics of normality: A modal approach. Artificial Intelligence, 68: 87–154, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

9. Craig Boutilier. Unifying default reasoning and belief revision in a modal framework, Artificial Intelligence, 68: 33–85, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

10. Craig Boutilier and Moisés Goldszmidt. Revision by conditional beliefs. In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 649–654, Washington, D.C., 1993.

11. Craig, Boutilier and Moisés Golszmidt. A theory of conditional belief revision. In G. Crocco, L. Fari nas del Cerro, and A. Herzig, editors, Conditional Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press, London, 1995 (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

12. Adnan Darwiche and Judea Pearl. On the logic of iterated belief revision. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pages 5–23, Pacific Grove, 1994.

13. André Fuhrmann. Theory contraction through base contraction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 20: 175–203, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

14. Peter Gärdenfors. Belief revisions and the Ramsey test for conditionals. The Philosophical Review, 95: 81–93, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

15. Peter Gärdenfors, Knowledge in Flux: Modelind the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

16. Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson. Revisions of Knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pages 83–95, Pacific Grove, 1988.

17. Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson. Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations. Artificial Intelligence, 65: 197–245, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

18. Moisés Goldszmidt and Judea Pearl. Reasoning with qualitative probabilities can be tractable. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Al, pages 112–120, Stanford, 1992.

19. Adam Grove. Two modellings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17: 157–170, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

20. Sven Ove Hansson. In defense of base contraction. Synthese, 91: 239–245, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

21. Sven Ove Hansson. In defense of the Ramsey test. Journal of Philosophy, 89: 522–540, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

22. Hector J. Levesque. All I know: A study in autoepistemic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 42:263–309, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

23. Isaac, Levi. Iteration of conditionals and the Ramsey test. Synthese, 76(1):49–81, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

24. David Lewis. Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

25. David Makinson and Peter Gärdenfors. Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic. In Andre Fuhrmann and Michael Moreau, editors, The Logic of Theory Change, pages 185–205, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

26. Judea Pearl, System, Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning. In M. Vardi, editor, Proceedings of Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pages 121–135. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

27. Hans Rott. Conditionals and theory change: Revisions, expansions, and additions. Synthese, 81:(1):91–113, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

28. Hans Rott. A nonmonotonic conditional logic for belief revision. In A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau, editors, The Logic of Theory Change, pages 135–181. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

29. Hans Rott. Belief change using generalized epistemic entrenchment. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 1(1):45–78, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

30. Karl Schlechta. Theory revision and probability. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 307(2):307–318, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

31. Wolfgang Spohn. Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states. In W.L. Harper and B. Skyrms, editors, Causation in Decision, Belief Change and Statistics, Volume 2, pages 105–134. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

32. Robert C. Stalnaker. A theory of conditionals. In W.L. Harper, R. Stalnaker, and G. Pearce, editors, Ifs, pages 41–55. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1968. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

33. Robert C. Stalnaker. Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references