Exploring User Acceptance of FOSS: The Role of the Age of the Users

1. A. Fuggetta, “Open source software—an evaluation”. Journal of Systems and Software Vol. 66 (1), pp. 77–90, 2003

   Google Scholar 

2. C. Ruffin, and C. Ebert, “Using open source software in product development: a primer”, IEEE Software Vol. 21 (1), pp. 82-86, 2004.

   Google Scholar 

3. A. Bonaccorsi and C. Rossi, “Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the Open Source movement. From community to business”, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bnaccorsirossimotivationlong.pdf, 2003 [25-03-2006].

4. G. Hertel, S. Niedner, and S. Herrmann, “Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel”, Research Policy Vol. 32 (7), pp. 1159-1177, 2003.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Y. Ye and K. Kishida, “Toward an Understanding of the Motivation of Open Source Software Developers”, International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2003). Portland - Oregon (EE.UU.), 2003.

   Google Scholar 

6. A. Hars and S. Ou, “Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects” International Journal of Electronic Commerce Vol. 6 (3), pp. 25-40, 2002.

   Google Scholar 

7. R. Ryan, and E. Deci, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions”, Contemporary Educational Psychology Vol. 25 (1), pp. 54-67, 2000.

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. M. Federman, “The Penguinist Discourse: A critical application of open source software project management to organization development”, Organization Development Journal Vol. 24 (2), pp. 89-100, 2006.

   Google Scholar 

9. M. Fink, “The business and economics of Linux and Open Source”. Ed. Prentience Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River - New Jersey (EE.UU.), 2003.

   Google Scholar 

10. N. Franke and E. Von Hippel, “Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software”, Research Policy Vol. 32 (7), pp. 1199-1215, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. M. Mustonen, “Copyleft–the economics of Linux and other open source software”, Information Economics and Policy Vol. 15 (1), pp. 99-121, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. G. Carbone and D. Stoddard, “Open source enterprise solutions”, Ed. Wiley, Nueva York (EE.UU.), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

13. X. Shen, “Developing Country Perspectives on Software: Intellectual Property and Open Source - A Case Study of Microsoft and Linux in China”, International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research Vol. 3 (1),pp. 21-43, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

14. R. Van Wendel and T. Egyedi, “Handling variety: the tension between adaptability and interoperability of open source software”. Computer Standards & Interfaces Vol. 28 (1), pp. 109-121, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. B. Dwan, “Open source vs closed”, Network Security Vol. 5, pp. 11-13, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. A. Bonaccorsi and C. Rossi, “Why Open Source software can succeed”. Research Policy Vol. 32 (7), pp. 1243-1258, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. S. Krishnamurthy, “A managerial overview of open source software”, Business Horizons, Vol. 46 (5), pp. 47-56. 2003

    Google Scholar 

18. K. Lakhani and E. Von Hippel, “How open source software works: "free" user-to-user assistance”, Research Policy Vol. 32 (6), pp.923-943, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. J. West, “How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies”, Research Policy Vol. 32 (7), pp. 1259-1285, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. J.P. Johnson, “Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good”, Journal of Economics&Management Strategy Vol. 11 (4), pp. 637-662, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. W. Scacchi, “Understanding the Requirements for Developing Open Source Software Systems”, IEE Proceedings–Software Vol. 149 (1), pp. 24-39, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

22. F.D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology”. MIS Quarterly Vol. 13 (3), pp. 319-340, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. V. Venkatesh and F.D. Davis, “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”. Management Science Vol. 46 (2), pp. 186-204, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science Vol. 35 (8), pp. 982–1003, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, “Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research”. Addison-Wesley. New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

26. M.D. Gallego, P. Luna, and S. Bueno, “Designing a forecasting analysis to understand the diffusion of open source software in the year 2010”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change Vol. 75 (5), pp. 672-686, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. M. G. Morris and V. Venkatesh, “Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force”, Personnel Psychology Vol. 53 (2), pp. 375-403, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. M. Igbaria, “User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test”, Omega, Vol. 21 (1), pp. 73-90, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. G. S. Hubona and E. Kennick, “The impact of external variables on information technology usage behavior”, 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hawaii (EE.UU.), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

30. J. C. Brancheau and J.C. Wetherbe, “The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 1(2), pp. 115-143, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references