Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Towards Handling Unconstrained User Preferences in Dialogue

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conversational AI for Natural Human-Centric Interaction

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 943))

  • 466 Accesses

Abstract

A user input to a schema-driven dialogue information navigation system, such as venue search, is typically constrained by the underlying database which restricts the user to specify a predefined set of preferences, or slots, corresponding to the database fields. We envision a more natural information navigation dialogue interface where a user has flexibility to specify unconstrained preferences that may not match a predefined schema. We propose to use information retrieval from unstructured knowledge to identify entities relevant to a user request. We construct an up-to-date database of restaurants in Cambridge, including unstructured knowledge snippets (reviews and information from the web) and annotate a set of query-snippet pairs with relevance labels. We use the annotated dataset to train and evaluate snippet relevance classifiers, as a proxy to evaluating recommendation accuracy. We show that with a pretrained transformer model as an encoder, an unsupervised/supervised classifier achieves a weighted F1 of 0.661/0.856.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A system may ask to narrow down the search criteria and a user may specify additional preferences in consecutive turns.

  2. 2.

    The dataset is compiled by crawling the Web in January 2021.

  3. 3.

    As the task was very short, the participants were not paid.

  4. 4.

    The number of top results (5) was chosen empirically since a user of a dialogue system may navigate over multiple search results.

  5. 5.

    Three query-snippet pairs with a known label are used to monitor work quality. The workers who did not pass the quality test were rejected.

  6. 6.

    https://www.gov.uk/national-minimum-wage-rates.

  7. 7.

    We use empirically chosen J \(=\) 5 and N \(=\) 5 in this work.

  8. 8.

    The vocabulary size in our domain is 30124.

  9. 9.

    Experiments were conducted with i7-6 cores CPU and single GTX 1080 GPU.

  10. 10.

    The project was completed during a 4-month internship and the annotation costs were under $300.

References

  1. Budzianowski P, Wen T-H, Tseng B-H, Casanueva I, Ultes S, Ramadan O, Gavsic M (2018) MultiWOZ—a large-scale multi-domain Wizard-of-Oz dataset for task-oriented dialogue modelling. In: Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Brussels, Belgium, pp 5016–5026

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rastogi A, Zang X, Sunkara S, Gupta R, Khaitan P (2020) Schema-guided dialogue state tracking task at DSTC8. In: Proceedings of the AAAI dialog system technology challenges workshop

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stoyanchev S, Keizer S, Doddipatla R (2021) Action state update approach to dialogue management. In: ICASSP 2021–2021 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp 7398–7402

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson M, Thomson B, Williams JD (2014) The second dialog state tracking challenge. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual SIGdial meeting on discourse and dialogue, pp 263–272

    Google Scholar 

  5. Trippas J.R, Spina D, Cavedon L, Joho H, Sanderson M (2018) Informing the design of spoken conversational search: Perspective paper. In: Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. CHIIR ’18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan Z, Duan N, Chen P, Zhou M, Zhou J, Li Z (2017) Building task-oriented dialogue systems for online shopping. In: Proceedings of the thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI’17. AAAI Press, San Francisco, CA, USA , pp 4618–4625

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vakulenko S, Revoredo K, Di Ciccio C, de Rijke M (2019) Qrfa: a data-driven model of information-seeking dialogues. In: Azzopardi L, Stein B, Fuhr N, Mayr P, Hauff C, Hiemstra D (eds) Advances in information retrieval. Springer, Cham, pp 541–557

    Google Scholar 

  8. Komatani K, Ueno S, Kawahara T, Okuno HG (2005) User modeling in spoken dialogue systems to generate flexible guidance. User Model User Adapt Interact 15(1–2):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomko S, Rosenfeld R (2004) Speech graffiti versus natural language: Assessing the user experience. In: Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004: short papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, MA, USA, pp 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim S, Eric M, Gopalakrishnan K, Hedayatnia B, Liu Y, Hakkani-Tur D (2020) Beyond domain APIs: Task-oriented conversational modeling with unstructured knowledge access. In: Proceedings of the 21th annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1st virtual meeting, pp 278–289

    Google Scholar 

  11. Louis A, Roth D, Radlinski F (2020) “I’d rather just go to bed”: Understanding indirect answers. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, pp 7411–7425

    Google Scholar 

  12. Radlinski F, Balog K, Byrne B, Krishnamoorthi K (2019) Coached conversational preference elicitation: a case study in understanding movie preferences. In: Proceedings of the annual SIGdial meeting on discourse and dialogue

    Google Scholar 

  13. Devlin J, Chang M.-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: NAACL-HLT

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Ng P, Ma X, Nallapati R, Xiang B (2019) Multi-passage bert: a globally normalized bert model for open-domain question answering. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp 5881–5885

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sakata W, Shibata T, Tanaka R, Kurohashi S (2019) Faq retrieval using query-question similarity and bert-based query-answer relevance. In: Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 1113–1116

    Google Scholar 

  16. Izacard G, Grave E (2021) Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open domain question answering. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference of the european chapter of the association for computational linguistics: main volume, pp 874–880

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhan J, Mao J, Liu Y, Zhang M, Ma S (2020) An analysis of BERT in document ranking. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 1941–1944

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bowman SR, Angeli G, Potts C, Manning CD (2015) A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference. In: EMNLP, pp 632–642

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 33(3):613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Salton G, Buckley C (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf Process Manag 24(5):513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reimers N, Gurevych I (2019) Sentence-bert: sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp 3982–3992

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gao Y, Colombo N, Wang W (2021) Adapting by pruning: a case study on BERT. arXiv:2105.03343

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetlana Stoyanchev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pandey, S., Stoyanchev, S., Doddipatla, R. (2022). Towards Handling Unconstrained User Preferences in Dialogue. In: Stoyanchev, S., Ultes, S., Li, H. (eds) Conversational AI for Natural Human-Centric Interaction. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 943. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5538-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5538-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5537-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5538-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics