Abstract
Named entity recognition and relation extraction are two fundamental tasks in the domain of natural language processing. Joint entity and relation extraction models have attracted more and more attention due to the performance advantage. However, there are difficulties in identifying overlapping relations among the models. To investigate the differences of structures and performances of joint extraction models, this paper implements a list of state-of-the-art joint extraction models and compares their difference in identifying overlapping relations. Experiment results show that the models by separating entity features and relation features work better than the models with feature fusion in identifying overlapping relations on three publicly available datasets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liu, L., Wang, D.: A survey of named entity recognition. Inf. Sci. 37(3), 329–340 (2018)
Xu, K., Feng, Y., Huang, S., Zhao, D.: Semantic relation classification via convolutional neural networks. Comput. Sci. 71(7), 132–137 (2015)
Qi, L., Ji, H.: Incremental joint extraction of entity mentions and relations. In: The 52th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 402–412 (2014)
Dai, D., Xiao, X., Lyu, Y., Dou, S., Wang, H.: Joint extraction of entities and overlapping relations using position-attentive sequence labeling. In: The AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 6300–6308 (2019)
Tan, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, W., Xiao, W.: Jointly extracting multiple triplets with multilayer translation constraints. In: The AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, no. 01, pp. 7080–7087 (2019)
Miwa, M., Bansal, M.: End-to-end relation extraction using LSTMs on sequences and tree structures. In: The 54th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 1105–1116 (2016)
Zheng, S., Wang, F., Bao, H., Zhou, P., Xu, B.: Joint extraction of entities and relations based on a novel tagging scheme. In: The 55th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 1227–1236 (2017)
Zeng, X., Zeng, D., He, S., Kang, L., Zhao, J.: Extracting relational facts by an end-to-end neural model with copy mechanism. In: The 56th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 506–514 (2018)
Giannis, B., Johannes, D., Thomas, D., Chris, D.: Joint entity recognition and relation extraction as a multi-head selection problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 114(Dec), 34–45 (2018)
Wang, J., Lu, W.: Two are better than one: Joint entity and relation extraction with table-sequence encoders. In: The 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1706–1721 (2020)
Wang,Y., Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Sun, L.: TPLinker: single-stage joint extraction of entities and relations through token pair linking. In: The 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1572–1582 (2020)
Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Xiao, L., Zettlemoyer, L. S., Weld, D. S.: Knowledge-based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In: The 49th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 541–550 (2011)
Zeng, D., Liu, K., Lai, S., Zhou, G., Zhao, J.: Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network. In: The 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 2335–2344 (2014)
Vu, N.T., Adel, H., Gupta, P., Schütze, H.: Combining recurrent and convolutional neural networks for relation classification. In: The 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 534–539 (2016)
Vashishth, S., Joshi, R., Prayaga, S.S., Bhattacharyya, C., Talukdar, P.: RESIDE: improving distantly-supervised neural relation extraction using side information. In: The 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1257–1266 (2018)
Nayak, T., Ng, H.T.: Effective attention modeling for neural relation extraction. In: The 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pp. 603–612 (2019)
Zhao, T., Yan, Z., Cao, Y., Li, Z.: Entity relative position representation based multi-head selection for joint entity and relation extraction. In: Sun, M., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., He, S., Rao, G. (eds.) CCL 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12522, pp. 184–198. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63031-7_14
Zhao, S., Hu, M., Cai, Z., Liu, F.: Modeling dense cross-modal interactions for joint entity-relation extraction. In: The 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 4032–4038 (2020)
Nayak, T., Ng, H.T.: Effective modeling of encoder-decoder architecture for joint entity and relation extraction. In: The AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 05, pp. 8528–8535 (2020)
Zhang, R.H., Liu, Q., Fan, A.X., Ji, H., Kurohashi, S.: Minimize exposure bias of seq2seq models in joint entity and relation extraction. In: The Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 236–246 (2020)
Sui, D., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Zhao, J., Liu, S.: Joint entity and relation extraction with set prediction networks. CoRR arXiv:2011.01675 (2020)
Gupta, P., Schütze, H., Andrassy, B.: Table filling multi-task recurrent neural network for joint entity and relation extraction. In: The 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING2016), pp. 2537–2547 (2016)
Ma, Y., Hiraoka, T., Okazaki, N.: Named entity recognition and relation extraction using enhanced table filling by Contextualized Representations. CoRR arXiv:2010.07522 (2020)
Zhong, Z., Chen, D.: A frustratingly easy approach for joint entity and relation extraction. CoRR arXiv:2010.12812 (2020)
Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A.: Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6323, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15939-8_10
Roth, D., Yih, W.: A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In: The 8th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pp. 1–4 (2010)
Sam, H., Kevin, B., Michele, F., Amber, S., Ozlem, U.: 2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction in electronic health records. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 27(1), 3–12 (2020)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61772146) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515011339).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luo, Y., Huang, Z., Zheng, K., Hao, T. (2021). Systematic Analysis of Joint Entity and Relation Extraction Models in Identifying Overlapping Relations. In: Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Hao, T. (eds) Neural Computing for Advanced Applications. NCAA 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1449. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5188-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5188-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5187-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5188-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)