The Framework of Consensus Equilibria for Gap Games in Blockchain Ecosystems

1. Biais, B., Bisire, C., Bouvard, M., Casamatta, C.: The blockchain folk theorem. Review Finan. Stud. 32(5), 1662–1715 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Bonneau, J., Miller, A., Clark, J., Narayanan, A., Kroll, A., Felten, E.: Research perspectives and challenges for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. In: Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, San Jose, California, USA, 18–20 May 2015

   Google Scholar 

3. Carlsten, M., Kalodner, H., Weinberg, S.M., Narayanan, A.: On the instability of Bitcoin without the block reward. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ACM, pp. 154–167, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 October 2016

   Google Scholar 

4. Chen, M., Wu, Q., Yang, B.: How valuable is FinTech innovation? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 2062–2106 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Chiu, J., Koeppl, T.: Blockchain-based settlement for asset trading. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1716–1753 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Cong, L.W., He, Z.: Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1754–1797 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. D’Acunto, F., Prabhala, N., Rossi, A.G.: The promises and pitfalls of Robo-Advising. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1983–2020 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Dai, J., Vasarhelyi, M.A.: Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. J. Inf. Syst. 31, 5–21 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

9. Di, L., Yang, Z., Yuan, G.X.: The consensus games for consensus economics under the framework of blockchain in Fintech. In: Li, D.-F. (ed.) EAGT 2019. CCIS, vol. 1082, pp. 1–26. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0657-4_1

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Di, L., Yuan, G.X., Tu, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X.: The existence of consensus equilibria for data trading under the framework of Internet of Things (IoT) with Blockchain ecosystems. In: Bie, R. Sun, Y. Yu, J. (eds.) 2019 International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 174, pp. 55–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2020)

    Google Scholar 

11. Eyal, I.: The Miners Dilemma. In: Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, San Jose, California, USA, 18–20 May 2015

    Google Scholar 

12. Eyal, I., Sirer, E.: Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, FC\(^{\prime }\)14, pp. 436–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

13. Foley, S., Karlsen, J.R., Putnins, T.: Sex, drugs, and Bitcoin: how much illegal activity is financed through Cryptocurrencies? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1798–1853 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Fuster, A., Plosser, M., Schnabl, S., Vickery, J.: The role of technology in mortgage lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1854–1899 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Goldstein, I., Jiang, W., Karolyi, G.: To FinTech and beyond. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1647–1661 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D., Ye, D., Kim, D.I., Zhao, J.: Toward secure blockchain-enabled internet of vehicles: optimizing consensus management using reputation and contract theory. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68(3), 2906–2920 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Kiayias, A., Koutsoupias, E., Kyropoulou, M., Tselekounis, Y.: Blockchain mining games. In: 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 24–28 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

18. Kroll, J., Davey, I., Felten, E.: The economics of Bitcoin mining, or Bitcoin in the presence of adversaries. In: Proceedings of The Twelfth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2013), Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA, 11–12 June 2013)

    Google Scholar 

19. Kwon, Y., Kim, D., Son, Y., Vasserman, E., Kim, Y.: Be selfish and avoid Dilemmas: fork after withholding (FAW) attacks on Bitcoin. In: 2017 ACM CCS 2017, Oct. 30–Nov. 3, 2017, Dallas, TX, USA. 2017 ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-4946-8/17/10 https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134019

20. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (2008)

21. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., Goldfeder, S.: Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

22. Nyumbayire, C.: The Nakamoto Consensus (https://www.interlogica.it/en/insight-en/nakamoto-consensus). Insight, Interlogica, February 2017

23. Sapirshtein, A., Sompolinsky, Y., Zohar, A.: Optimal selfish mining strategies in Bitcoin. In: Grossklags, J., Preneel, B. (eds.) FC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9603, pp. 515–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

24. Tang, H.: Peer-to-Peer lenders versus banks: substitutes or complements? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1900–1938 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Tsabary, I., Eyal, I.: The gap game. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (CCS 2018), pp. 713–728 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

26. Vallee, B., Zeng, Y.: Marketplace lending: a new banking paradigm? Revi. Financial Stud. 32(5), 1939–1982 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Yang, Z., Yuan, G.X.: Some generalizations of Zhao’s theorem: hybrid solutions and weak hybrid solutions for games with nonordered preferences. J. Math. Econ. 84, 94–100 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

28. Yuan, G.X.: The study of equilibria for abstract economies in topological vector spaces-a unified approach. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 37, 409–430 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Zhao, J.: The hybrid solutions of an \(N\)-person game. Games Econ. Behav. 4, 145–160 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

30. Zhu, C.: Big data as a governance mechanism. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5), 2021–2061 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references