Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Auditing Between Event Logs and Process Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital TV and Multimedia Communication (IFTC 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1009))

  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

Targeting the auditing problem in process mining, this paper proposed a novel approach to carry out auditing between event logs and process trees. Firstly, all the possible problems in auditing of event logs and process trees were analyzed. Then, the set of first activity for a process tree (FirstSet) was defined to solve the sub-tree choice problem; and the set of following activity for a process tree (FollowSet) was proposed to solve the auto-matching problems. Then, AnalyForm and Process tree auditing algorithm were provided to audit event logs and a process tree. An example was given to illustrate the given algorithms subsequently. Four sorts of comparison were carried out between Process tree auditing and A* alignment algorithm: the computation time for a few traces and batches of traces, the computation time of different noise percent and length of traces. From the comparative experimental results, Process tree auditing algorithm was superior to A* alignment algorithm in batches of event logs auditing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes, pp. 95–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fahland, D., Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Model repair-aligning process models to reality. Inf. Syst. 47, 220–243 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2013.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kharbili, M.E., De Medeiros, A.K.A., Stein, S., et al.: Business process conformance checking: current state and future challenges. In: MobIS 2008. LNI, vol. 141, GI, 008, pp. 107–113 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adriansyah, A.A.: Aligning observed and modeled behavior. Technische Universiteitndhoven (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adriansyah, A.A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: 5th IEEE International EDOC, pp. 55–64 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verbeek, H.M.W.: Decomposed replay using hiding and reduction as abstraction. In: Koutny, M., Kleijn, J., Penczek, W. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XII. LNCS, vol. 10470, pp. 166–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55862-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L., Du, Y.Y., Liu, W.: Aligning observed and modelled behaviour based on workflow decomposition. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 11(8), 1207–1227 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2016.1193633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Van Hee, K., Van der Werf, J.M., et al.: Conceptual model for online auditing. Decis. Support Syst. 50, 636–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs - a constructive approach. In: Colom, J.-M., Desel, J. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7927, pp. 311–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38697-8_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongxia Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, H., Hou, H., Du, Y., Liu, Z. (2019). Auditing Between Event Logs and Process Trees. In: Zhai, G., Zhou, J., An, P., Yang, X. (eds) Digital TV and Multimedia Communication. IFTC 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1009. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8138-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8138-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8137-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8138-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics