Tinkering

• Cohn, M. L. (2016). Convivial decay: Entangled lifetimes in a geriatric infrastructure. In CSCW’16 Proceedings and companion of the ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work and social computing, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1511–1523.

  Google Scholar 

• Danyi, E. (2022). Melancholy democracy: Politics beyond hope and despair. Habilitation submitted, Institut für Soziologie, Goethe-Universität.

  Google Scholar 

• Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2011). Materiality, maintenance and fragility: The care of things. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1947255.

  Google Scholar 

• Denis, J. & Pontille, D. (2013). Material ordering and the care of things, CSI Working Papers Series 034, Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech. https://ideas.repec.org/p/emn/wpaper/034.html.

• Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2015). Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 40(3), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553129

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). State University of New York Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gilligan, C. (1982). New maps of development: New visions of maturity. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb02682.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Duke University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Heuts, F., & Mol, A. (2013). What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Houston, L., Jackson, S. J., Rosner, D. K., Ahmed, S. I., Young, M., & Kang, L. (2016). Values in repair. In J. Kaye, A. Druin, C. Lampe, D. Morris, & J. P. Hourcade (Eds.), #chi4good: CHI 2016, San Jose, CA, May 7–12 (pp. 1403–1414).

  Google Scholar 

• Jack, M., & Jackson, S. J. (2016). Logistics as care and control. In J. Kaye, A. Druin, C. Lampe, D. Morris, & J. P. Hourcade (Eds.), #chi4good: CHI 2016. San Jose, CA, May 7–12 (pp. 2209–2219). Association for Computing Machinery Inc. (ACM).

  Google Scholar 

• Jackson, S. J. (2014). 11 Rethinking repair. In Gillespie, T., Boczkowksi, P. & Foot, K. A. (Eds.) Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 221–239). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0015.

• Kocksch, L., Korn, M., Poller, A., & Wagenknecht, S. (2018). Caring for IT Security: Accountabilities, moralities, and oscillations in IT security practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), Article 92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274361.

• Latimer, J. (2000). Socialising disease: Medical categories and inclusion of the aged. The Sociological Review, 48(3), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00222

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Law, J., & Lin, W. (2010). Cultivating disconcertment. The Sociological Review, 58(2_suppl), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01966.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social studies of science, 45(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mol, A. (2003). The body multiple. Duke University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Mol, A. (2006). Proving or improving: On health care research as a form of self-reflection. Qualitative health research, 16(3), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285856

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care. Routledge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In Care in practice (pp. 7–26). https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839414477.7

• Nowviskie, B. (2015). Digital humanities in the anthropocene. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 30(suppl_1), i4–i15.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pinel, C., Prainsack, B., & McKevitt, C. (2020). Caring for data. Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 50(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720906567

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puig de La Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Puig de La Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press. (Posthumanities, v.41).

  Google Scholar 

• Singleton, V. (2010). Good farming control or care? In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 235–256). Transcript.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Toombs, A. L., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2015). The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’15 (pp. 629–638). ACM Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702284.

• Tronto, J. C. (1998). An ethic of care. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 22(3), 15–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African logic (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

Download references