Abstract
The focus of existing GIS is either on data management or on algorithm performance. There is a lack of comprehensive solutions for data management, geographic computing, and visualization. At the service level, existing systems emphasize the extensibility of services rather than high performance. The future development trend is to combine the latest computer technology and information technology, with a focus on solving problems related to large-scale geographic information applications. GIS should integrate with emerging application environments such as mobile internet, and enhance its integrated development with applications in related fields. Under the support of new computing architectures, new GIS software platforms need to construct a high-performance geospatial computation, spatial analysis, and storage environment at the infrastructure level, and build a wide-ranging and multi-tiered geospatial information service system at the upper level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zhang J, You S, Gruenwald L, et al. Large-scale Spatial Data Processing on GPUs and GPU-Accelerated Clusters [J]. Sigspatial Special, 2015, 6(3): 27–34.
Shi X, Lai C, Huang M, et al. Geocomputation over the Emerging Heterogeneous Computing Infrastructure [J]. Transactions in Gis, 2014: 3–24.
Xiong W, Chen L. HiGIS: An Open Framework for High Performance Geographic Information System [J]. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2015, 15(3): 123–132.
Eldawy A, Mokbel M F. The Era of Big Spatial Data [C]. International Conference on Data Engineering, 2015: 1424–1427.
Guan Q, Shi X, Huang M, et al. A Hybrid Parallel Cellular Automata Model for Urban Growth Simulation over GPU/CPU Heterogeneous Architectures [J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2016, 30(3): 494–514.
Foster I, Kesselman C. Globus: a Metacomputing Infrastructure Toolkit [C]. IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing Data and Analytics, 1997, 11(2): 115–128.
Cinquini L, Crichton D J, Mattmann C A, et al. The Earth System Grid Federation: an open infrastructure for access to distributed geospatial data [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2014: 400–417.
Sara S., Willie T., Samad M. E. S. Digital Twin and CyberGIS for Improving Connectivity and Measuring the Impact of Infrastructure Construction Planning in Smart Cities [J]. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(4): 240
Shekhar S, Gunturi V, Evans M R, et al. Spatial Big-data Challenges Intersecting Mobility and Cloud Computing [C]. Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access, 2012: 1–6.
Xiaochuang Y., Guoqing L., Big Spatial Vector Data Management: a Review [J], Big Earth Data, 2018, 2(1): 108–129
Sun C, Wang Z, Wang K, et al. Adaptive BPEL Service Compositions via Variability Management: a Methodology and Supporting Platform [J]. International Journal of Web Services Research, 2019, 16(1): 37–69.
Oinn T, Greenwood M, Addis M, et al. Taverna: Lessons in Creating a Workflow Environment for the Life Sciences [J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2006, 18(10): 1067–1100.
Taylor I, Shields M, Wang I, et al. Visual Grid Workflow in Triana [J]. Journal of Grid Computing, 2005, 3(3–4): 153–169.
Ludäscher B, Altintas I, Berkley C, et al. Scientific Workflow Management and the Kepler System [J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2006, 18(10): 1039–1065.
Deelman E, Vahi K, Rynge M, et al. Pegasus in the Cloud: Science Automation through Workflow Technologies [J]. IEEE Internet Computing, 2016, 20(1): 70–76.
Kalayci S, Dasgupta G, Fong L, et al. Distributed and Adaptive Execution of Condor DAGMan Workflows [C]//SEKE. 2010: 587–590.
Reich M, Liefeld T, Gould J, et al. GenePattern 2.0 [J]. Nature genetics, 2006, 38(5): 500.
Maitrey S, Jha C K. MapReduce: Simplified Data Analysis of Big Data [J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 57: 563–571.
Liew C S, Atkinson M P, Galea M, et al. Scientific Workflows: Moving Across Paradigms [J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2017, 49(4): 66.
Von Laszewski G, Hategan M, Kodeboyina D. Java CoG Kit Workflow [M]//Workflows for e-Science. Springer, London, 2007: 340–356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 National Defense Industry Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xiong, W., Wu, Y., Ouyang, X., Jia, Qr., Chen, H., Chen, L. (2024). The Architecture of High-Performance GIS. In: High Performance Geographic Information System. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7170-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7170-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-7169-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-7170-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)