Abstract
Bell’s Theorem proved that one cannot in general reproduce the results of quantum theory with a classical, deterministic local model. However, Einstein originally considered the case where one could define an “element of reality”, namely for the much simpler case where one could predict with certainty a definite outcome for an experiment For this simple case, Bell’s Theorem says nothing. But by using a slightly more complicated model than Bell, one can show that even in this simple case where one can make definite predictions, one still cannot generally introduce deterministic, local models to explain the results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, (1935) Phys. Rev., 47, 777.
N. Bohr, (1935) Phys. Rev., 48, 696.
D. Bohm, (1951) “Quantum Theory”, Prentice-Hall, New York,.
J. S. Bell, (1965) Physics (N. Y.) 1, 195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M.A., Zeilinger, A. (1989). Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem. In: Kafatos, M. (eds) Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4058-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0849-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive