The Organisation of Interaction in Distributed Collaborative Learning

• Andreassen, E. F. (2000). Evaluating how students organise their work in a collaborative telelearning scenario: An Activity Theoretical Perspective. Master Thesis, University of Bergen.

  Google Scholar 

• Arnseth, H. C., & Solheim, I. (2002). Making Sense of Shared Knowledge. Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, January 7-11 2002, Boulder, Colorado.

  Google Scholar 

• Bannon, L. (1989). Issues in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of NATO Advanced Workshop on CSCL, September 24-28 1989, Maratea, Italy.

  Google Scholar 

• Bourguin, G., & Derycke, A. (2001). Integrating the CSCL Activities into Virtual Campuses: Foundations of a new Infrastructure for Distributed Collective Activities. Proceedings of European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, March 22-24 2001, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions, Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Blaker, M., Blaye, P., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The Evolution of Research on Collaborative Learning. In H. Spada (Ed.), Learning in humans and machines. Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). London: Pergamon.

  Google Scholar 

• Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. Proceedings of Conference on CSCW, November 1-4 1992, Toronto, Canada.

  Google Scholar 

• Engeström, Y. (1990). When is a tool? In Y. Engeström (Ed.), Learning, Working, and Imagining (pp. 171–195). Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

  Google Scholar 

• Fjuk, A., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (1997). Articulation of Actions in Distributed Collaborative Learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 3–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Fjuk, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2001). The Complexity of Distributed Collaborative Learning: Unit of Analysis. Proceedings of European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, March 22-24 2001, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.

  Google Scholar 

• Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 93–150.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Guribye, F. (1999). Evaluating a Collaborative Telelearning Scenario: A Sociocultural Perspective (EIST Research Report No. 4): University of Bergen, Norway.

  Google Scholar 

• Guribye, F., & Wasson, B. (2002). The Ethnography of Distributed Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, January 7-11 2002, Boulder, Colorado, USA.

  Google Scholar 

• Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11 (3–4), 411–446.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gutwin, C., Stark, G., & Greenberg, S. (1995). Support for Workspace Awareness in Educational Groupware. Proceedings of The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, October 17-20 1995, Bloomington, Indiana.

  Google Scholar 

• Heath, C., Jirotka, M., Luff, P., & Hindmarsh, J. (1995). The Individual and the Collaborative. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 3(1), 147–165.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1996). Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Malone, T., & Crowston, K. G. (1994). Toward an interdisciplinary theory of coordination (Techical Report No. 120). Cambridge, MA: MIT, Center for Coordination Science.

  Google Scholar 

• Meistad, Ø., & Wasson, B. (2000). Supporting Collaborative Telelearning Research Using Server Logs. Proceedings of Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, June 26–July 1 2000, Montreal, Canada.

  Google Scholar 

• Schmidt, K. (2001). Computer-supported cooperative work — and learning. Proceedings of Travail coopératif et NTIC en environnements ouverts de formation, FREREF workshop, 9-10 July 2001, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona.

  Google Scholar 

• Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, 1(1), 7–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW. CSCW-The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 5 (2–3, Special Issue: ‘The Design of Cooperative Systems’), 155-200.

  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G. (2002a). Contributions to a Theoretical Framework for CSCL. Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, January 7-11 2002, Boulder, Colorado.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G. (2002b). Groupware goes to School. Proceedings of Groupware: Design, Implementation and Use, 8th International Workshop, September 1-4 2002, La Serena, Chile.

  Google Scholar 

• Star, S. L. (1996). Working Together. Symbolic Interactionism, activity theory, and information systems. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 296–318). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Wasson, B. (1998). Identifying Coordination Agents for Collaborative Telelearning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 275–299.

  Google Scholar 

• Wasson, B., Guribye, F., & Mörch, A. (2000). Project DoCTA: Design and use of Collaborative Telelearning Artefacts. Oslo: unipub.

  Google Scholar 

Download references