Abstract
High quality mammography can detect early, curable breast cancer and decrease mortality. Much research effort is being expended to improve mammography (digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis [CAD]), and develop alternative modalities (ultrasound, MRI, radionuclide imaging). However, the human observer is at this point potentially the weakest link in the diagnostic imaging chain, and the range of performance in routine practice is unknown. We have conducted a large observer study using a standardized test base to further investigate this issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmidt, R.A. et al. (1998). Mammographic Screening: Sensitivity of General Radiologists. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_62
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive