An Ontology for Task World Models

1. Bevan, N.: Ergonomic requirements for office work with VDTs. part 11, ISO DIS 9241–11

   Google Scholar 

2. Card, S.K., Moran T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

   Google Scholar 

3. Johnson, P., Johnson, H.: Task Knowledge Structures: Psychological basis and integration into system design. Acta Psychologica 78, pp 3–26, 1991

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Johnson, P., Wilson, S., Markopoulos, P., Pycock, J.: Adept — Advanced Design Environment for Prototyping with Task Models. Proceedings InterCHI’93, Demonstration Abstract, Addison-Wesley, April 1993.

   Google Scholar 

5. Johnson, P., Johnson, H., Waddington, R., Shouls, A.: Task-Related Knowledge Structures: Analysis, Modelling and Application. People and Computers IV 1988, Proceedings 4^th British Computer Society HCl group

   Google Scholar 

6. Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.K.: A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis Ltd 1992

   Google Scholar 

7. Mayhew, D.J.: Principles and Guidelines in Software User Interface Design. ISBN 0–13-721929–6, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey, 1992.

   Google Scholar 

8. Markopoulos, P., Gikas, S.: Towards a Formal Model for Extant Task Knowledge Representation. In C. Stary (ed.), First Interdisciplinary Workshop on Cognitive Modelling and User Interface Development, Vienna, December 1994.

   Google Scholar 

9. Paterno, F., Mancini, C, Meniconi, S.: Concur Task Trees: A Diagrammatic Notation for Specifying Task Models. Proceedings of Interact 97, 14–18 July 1997

   Google Scholar 

10. Scapin, D., Pierret-Golbreich, C: Towards a method for task description: MAD. Work with display units 89, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

11. Sebillotte, S.: Hierarchical planning as method for task analysis: The example of office task analysis. Behaviour and Information Technology 7(3), 275–293, 1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Szekely, P., Luo, P., Neches, R.: Beyond Interface Builders: Model-Based Interface Tools. In Proceedings of INTERCHI 93 April, 1993, pp. 383–390

    Google Scholar 

13. Tauber, M.J.: ETAG: Extended Task Action Grammar — A language for the description of the user’s task language. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, G. Cockton and B. Shackel, Proceedings INTERACT 90, Amsterdam, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

14. van der Veer, G.C., Lenting, B.F., Bergevoet, B.A.J.: GTA: Groupware Task Analysis — Modeling Complexity. Acta Psychologica 91, 1996, pp. 297–322 Acta Paper

    Google Scholar 

15. van der Veer, G.C., Mariani, M.: Teaching Design of Complex Interactive Systems. Learning by Interacting TeaDIS, Teaching Design of Interactive Systems, Schaerding, Austria, 20 – 23 May 1997

    Google Scholar 

16. van der Veer, G.C., van Welie, M., Thorborg, D.: Modeling Complex Processes in GTA. Sixth European Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control (CSAPC), pp. 87–91, Rome, Italy, 23–26 September 1997

    Google Scholar 

17. Rex Hartson, H., Siochi, A.C., Hix, D.: The UAN: a user-oriented representation for direct manipulation interface designs. ACM Transactions on Information Systems Vol.8, No. 3 (July 1990), pp. 181–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references