Introducing Patient and Dentist Profiling and Crowdsourcing to Improve Trust in Dental Care Recommendation Systems

1. Bhuiyan, T., Xu, Y., Josang, A.: State-of-the-Art Review on Opinion Mining from Online Customer’s Feedback. In: The 9th Asia-Pacific Complex Systems Conference, Tokyo, Japan, November 4 -7 (2009)

   Google Scholar 

2. Ratzan, S.C.: Our New “Social” Communication Age in Health. Journal of Health Communication 16(8), 803–804 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Swan, M.: Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 6(2), 492–525 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Lilien, L., Bhargava, B.: Trading privacy for trust in online interactions. Idea Group (2008)

   Google Scholar 

5. Jøsang, A., Quattrociocchi, W., Karabeg, D.: Taste and trust. In: Wakeman, I., Gudes, E., Jensen, C.D., Crampton, J. (eds.) Trust Management V. IFIP AICT, vol. 358, pp. 312–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

6. Gray, E., Seigneur, J.-M., Chen, Y., Jensen, C.: Trust propagation in small worlds. In: Nixon, P., Terzis, S. (eds.) iTrust 2003. LNCS, vol. 2692, pp. 239–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

7. Shu, W., Chuang, Y.H.: The perceived benefits of six-degree-separation social networks. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 21(1), 26–45 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Barnett, E.: Facebook cuts six degrees separation to four. In: The Telegraph (November 22, 2011), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8906693/Facebook-cuts-six-degrees-of-separation-to-four.html (2012)

9. Hou, J., Shim, M.: The Role of Provider–Patient Communication and Trust in Online Sources in Internet Use for Health-Related Activities. Journal of Health Communication 15(S3), 186–199 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Tustin, N.: The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. Journal of Health Communication 15(1), 3–17 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

11. Pickens, J.: Attitudes and perceptions. In: Borkowski, N. (ed.). Organizational Behavior in Health Care, ch. 3, Michael Brown, USA, pp. 43–76 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

12. Ferguson, M.J., Bargh, J.A.: Beyond the attitude object: Automatic attitudes spring from object-centered-objects. In: Wittenbrink, B., Schwarz, N. (eds.) Implicit Measures of Attitudes, pp. 216–246 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

13. Moturu, S., Liu, H.: Quantifying the Trustworthiness of Social Media Content: Content Analysis for the Social Web. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

14. Su, X., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Hindawi Publishing, Advances in Artificial Intelligence (2009)

    Google Scholar 

15. Walter, F.E., Battiston, S., Schweltzer, F.: A model of trust-based recommendation system on a social network. Auton Agent Multi-Agent System 16, 57–74 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Lopez-Nores, M., Blanco-Fernandez, Y., Pazos-Arias, J.J., Diaz-Redondo, R.P.: Property-Based Collaborative Filtering: A New Paradigm for Semantics-Based, Health-Aware Re-commender Systems. In: Fifth International Workshops on Semantics Media Adaptation and Personalization (2010)

    Google Scholar 

17. Dokoohadi, N., Matskin, M.: Personalizing Human Interaction through Hybrid Ontological Profiling Cultural Heritage Case Study. In: International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Human Aspects (SWAHA), Collocated with 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC), pp. 133–140 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

18. Goudge, J., Gilson, L.: How can trust be investigated? Drawing lessons from past experience. Social Science & Medicine 61(7), 1439–1451 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Victor, P., De Cock, M., Cornelis, C.: Trust and Recommendations. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, 1st edn. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

20. Josang, A., Pope, S.: Semantic constraints for trust transitivity, pp. 59–68. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

21. Golbeck, J.: Computing and applying Trust in web-based Social Networks, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

22. DISC Insights, http://www.discinsights.com

23. Meyer, E.: Meeting the needs of difficult dental patients, clear communication and careful preparation can help moderate stressful situations. Inside Dental Assisting 10(5) (September/October 2012)

    Google Scholar 

24. Pradhan, S., Gay, V., Nepal, S.: Social Networking and Dental Care: State of the Art and Analysis of the Impact on Dentists, Dental Practices and their Patients. In: BLED 2013 Proceedings, Paper 22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

25. Sbaraini, A., Carter, S.M., Evans, W., Blinkhorn, A.: Experiences of dental care: What do patients value? BMC Health Services Research 12, 177 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Yarascavitch, C., Regehr, G., Hodges, B., Haas, D.A.: Changes in Dental Student Empathy During Training. Journal of Dental Education 73(4), 509–517 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

27. Merijohn, G.K., Bader, J.D., Frantsve-Hawley, J., Aravamudhan, K.: Clinical decision support chairside tools for evidence-based dental practice. Journal Evid. Base Dent. Pract. 8, 119–132 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Mettes, T.G., van der Sanden, W.J.M., Mokkink, H.G., Wensing, M., Grol, R.P.T.M., Plasschaert, A.J.M.: Routine oral examinations in primary care: Which predictors deter-mine what is done?, A prospective clinical case recording study. Journal of Dentistry 36, 435–443 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references