Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Cognitive Architectures and Agents

  • Chapter
Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

Abstract

A cognitive architecture is the essential structures and processes of a domain-generic computational cognitive model used for a broad, multiple-level, multiple domain analysis of cognition and behavior. This chapter reviews some of the most popular psychologically-oriented cognitive architectures, namely adaptive control of thought-rational (GlossaryTerm

ACT-R

), Soar, and CLARION. For each cognitive architecture, an overview of the model, some key equations, and a detailed simulation example are presented. The example simulation with GlossaryTerm

ACT-R

is the initial learning of the past tense of irregular verbs in English (developmental psychology), the example simulation with Soar is the well-known missionaries and cannibals problem (problem solving), and the example simulation with CLARION is a complex mine field navigation task (autonomous learning). This presentation is followed by a discussion of how cognitive architectures can be used in multi-agent social simulations. A detailed cognitive social simulation with CLARION is presented to reproduce results from organizational decision-making. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the impact of neural network modeling on cognitive architectures and a comparison of the different models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACS:

action-centered subsystem

ACT-R:

adaptive control of thought-rational

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

DLPFC:

dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

MCS:

meta-cognitive subsystem

MS:

motivational subsystem

NACS:

non-action-centered subsystem

PSCM:

problem-space computational model

RL:

reinforcement learning

VLPFC:

ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

References

  1. A. Newell: Unified Theories of Cognition (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Roberts, H. Pashler: How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing, Psychol. Rev. 107, 358–367 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Sun: Desiderata for cognitive architectures, Philos. Psychol. 17, 341–373 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Franklin, F.G. Patterson Jr.: The Lida architecture: Adding new modes of learning to an intelligent, autonomous, software agent, Integr. Design Process Technol. IDPT-2006, San Diego (Society for Design and Process Science, San Diego 2006) p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.A. Carpenter, S. Grossberg: A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 37, 54–115 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Langley, J.E. Laird, S. Rogers: Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges, Cogn. Syst. Res. 10, 141–160 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Sun, E. Merrill, T. Peterson: From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill learning, Cogn. Sci. 25, 203–244 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Anderson, D. Bothell, M.D. Byrne, S. Douglass, C. Lebiere, Y. Qin: An integrated theory of the mind, Psychol. Rev. 111, 1036–1060 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N.A. Taatgen, J.R. Anderson: Constraints in cognitive architectures. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, ed. by R. Sun (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York 2008) pp. 170–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. J.R. Anderson: The Adaptive Character of Thought (Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.R. Anderson, D. Bothell, M.D. Byrne, S. Douglass, C. Lebiere, Y. Qin: An integrated theory of the mind, Psychol. Rev. 111, 1037 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N.A. Taatgen, C. Lebiere, J.R. Anderson: Modeling paradigms in ACT-R. In: Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation, ed. by R. Sun (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York 2006) pp. 29–52

    Google Scholar 

  13. N.A. Taatgen, J.R. Anderson: Why do children learn to say “broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback, Cognition 86, 123–155 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G.F. Marcus, S. Pinker, M. Ullman, M. Hollander, T.J. Rosen, F. Xu: Overregularization in language acquisition, Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 57, 1–182 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Laird, A. Newell, P.S. Rosenbloom: Soar: An architecture for general intelligence, Artif. Intell. 33, 1–64 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.F. Lehman, J. Laird, P. Rosenbloom: A Gentle Introduction to Soar, an Architecture for Human Cognition (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.E. Wray, R.M. Jones: Considering Soar as an agent architecture. In: Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation, ed. by R. Sun (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York 2006) pp. 53–78

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.E. Laird: Extending the Soar cognitive architecture, Proc. 1st Conf. Artif. General Intell. (IOS Press, Amsterdam 2008) pp. 224–235

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.L. Schacter, A.D. Wagner, R.L. Buckner: Memory systems of 1999. In: The Oxford Handbook of Memory, ed. by E. Tulving, F.I.M. Craik (Oxford Univ. Press, New York 2000) pp. 627–643

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Nason, J.E. Laird: Soar-RL: Integrating reinforcement learning with Soar, Cogn. Syst. Res. 6, 51–59 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K.R. Scherer: Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. In: Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research, ed. by K.R. Scherer, A. Schor, T. Johnstone (Oxford Univ. Press, New York 2001) pp. 92–120

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Watkins: Learning from Delayed Rewards (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Sun, S. Hélie: Psychologically realistic cognitive agents: Taking human cognition seriously, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 25(1), 65–92 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Sun: Duality of the Mind: A Bottom-up Approach Toward Cognition (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Sun, T. Peterson: Multi-agent reinforcement learning: Weighting and partitioning, Neural Netw. 12, 127–153 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. Hirschfield, S. Gelman (Eds.): Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Michalski: A theory and methodology of inductive learning, Artif. Intell. 20, 111–161 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Sun, P. Slusarz, C. Terry: The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach, Psychol. Rev. 112, 159–192 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Hélie, R. Sun: Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model, Psychol. Rev. 117, 994–1024 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Sun: Integrating Rules and Connectionism for Robust Commonsense Reasoning (Wiley, New York 1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. F. Toates: Motivational Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Sun: Motivational representations within a computational cognitive architecture, Cogn. Comput. 1, 91–103 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. T. Nelson (Ed.): Metacognition: Core Readings (Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.D. Smith, W.E. Shields, D.A. Washburn: The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition, Behav. Brain Sci. 26, 317–373 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Sun, I. Naveh: Simulating organizational decision-making using a cognitively realistic agent model, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 7(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. M. Carley, M. J. Prietula, Z. Lin: Design versus cognition: The interaction of agent cognition and organizational design on organizational performance, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 1 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Hélie, J.G. Waldschmidt, F.G. Ashby: Automaticity in rule-based and information-integration categorization, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 1013–1031 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Hélie, J.L. Roeder, F.G. Ashby: Evidence for cortical automaticity in rule-based categorization, J. Neurosci. 30, 14225–14234 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J.R. Anderson: The Architecture of Cognition (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. Rumelhart, J. McClelland, The PDP Research Group (Eds.): Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations (MIT Pres, Cambridge 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Russell, P. Norvig: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River 1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. C. Lebiere, J.R. Anderson: A connectionist implementation of the ACT-R production system, Proc. 15th Annu. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale 1993) pp. 635–640

    Google Scholar 

  43. B. Cho, P.S. Rosenbloom, C.P. Dolan: Neuro-Soar: A neural-network architecture for goal-oriented behavior, Proc. 13th Annu. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale 1991) pp. 673–677

    Google Scholar 

  44. N. Wilson, R. Sun, R. Mathews: A motivationally-based simulation of performance degradation under pressure, Neural Netw. 22, 502–508 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cognitive Science Dep., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Carnegie 302A, NY 12180, Troy, USA

    Ron Sun

  2. Dep. Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, IN 47907-2081, West Lafayette, USA

    Sebastien Hélie

Authors
  1. Sebastien Hélie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ron Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastien Hélie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Research Inst., Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Newelska 6, 01-447, Warsaw, Poland

    Janusz Kacprzyk

  2. Dep. Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, 116 Street 9107, T6J 2V4, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Witold Pedrycz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hélie, S., Sun, R. (2015). Cognitive Architectures and Agents. In: Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (eds) Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43504-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43505-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation