Online Dispute Resolution and Models of Relational Law and Justice: A Table of Ethical Principles

1. Al-Adwan, M.K.M.: The Legitimacy of Online Alternative Dispute Resolution (ODR). International Journal of Business and Social Science 2(19), 167–169 (2011)

   Google Scholar 

2. Bernard, P., Garth, B.: Dispute Resolution Ethics: A Comprehensive Guide. ABA, Section of Dispute Resolution, Washington D.C. (2002)

   Google Scholar 

3. Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data (updated 2009), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

4. http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_on_the_next_web.html

5. Bodriagov, O., Buchegger, S.: Crowdsourcing and Ethics: The Employment of Crowdsourcing Workers for Tasks that Violate Privacy and Ethics. In: Elovici, Y., Altshuler, Y. (eds.) Security and Privacy in Social Networks, pp. 47–66. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)

   Google Scholar 

6. Boehm, F.: Information Sharing and Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

   Book  Google Scholar 

7. Bott, M., Young, G.: The Role of Crowdsourcing for Better Governance in International Development. PRAXIS The Fletcher Journal of Human Security 27, 47–70 (2012)

   Google Scholar 

8. Bowden, C.: The US surveillance programmes and their impact on EU citizens’ fundamental rights. In: Presented to the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE Committee), PE 474.405 (September 05, 2013) , http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/briefingnote_/briefingnote_en.pdf

9. Bruce, T.R.: Foundings on the Cathedral Steps. In: Peruginelli, G., Ragona, M. (eds.) Law via the Internet. Free Access, Quality of Information, Effectiveness of Rights, pp. 411–422. European Press Academic Publishing, Florence (2009)

   Google Scholar 

10. Burns, R.: Connecting Grassroots to Government for Disaster Management. The Wilson Center (2012), http://burnsr77.github.io/assets/uploads/Workshop_BackgroundReading.pdf

11. Cameron, K.: The Laws of Identity...as of November 5, 2005. Microsoft Corporation (2005), http://www.identityblog.com/stories/2005/05/13/TheLawsOfIdentity.pdf

12. Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Neves, J.: Towards Domain-Independent Conflict Resolution Tools. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 2, pp. 145–148. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

13. Casanovas, P., Poblet, M.: Concepts and fields of Relational Justice. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 323–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

14. Casanovas, P.: Agreement and Relational Justice: A Perspective from Philosophy and Sociology of Law. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Agreement Technologies. LGTS, vol. 8, pp. 19–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

15. Casanovas, P.: Social Intelligence: A New Perspective on Relational Law. In: Schweighofer, E., Meinrad Handstanger, H., Hoffmann, F.K., Primosch, E., Schefbeck, G., Withalm, G. (eds.) Festchrift für Friedrich Lachmayer. Zeichen und Zauber des Rechts, pp. 493–510. Editions Weblab, Bern (2014)

    Google Scholar 

16. Casanovas, P.: Philosophy and Technology. Special Issue on Information Society and Ethical Inquiries (2014), doi:10.1007/s13347-014-0170-y

    Google Scholar 

17. Casanovas, P., Barral, I. (Guest Editors): Special Section on Legal XML and Online Dispute Resolution. Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico 10, 1–432 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

18. Castelfranchi, C.: Minds as Social Institutions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science (2013), doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9324-0

    Google Scholar 

19. Cavoukian, A.: Privacy by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles. Implementation and Mapping of Fair information Practices. Information an Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada (2010)

    Google Scholar 

20. Cortés, P., de la Rosa, F.E.: Building a Global Redress System for Low Value Crossborder Disputes. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62(2), 407–440 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Cortés, P.: Developing Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the EU: A Proposal for the Regulation of Accredited Providers. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 19(1), 1–28 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Datta, P., Chatterjee, S.: Online Consumer Market Inefficiencies and Intermediation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 42(2), 55–75 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. D’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Communicating open systems. Artificial Intelligence 186, 38–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Egger, F.N.: Deceptive Technologies: Cash, Ethics & HCI, SIGCHI Bulletin, p. 11 (May/June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

25. Floridi, L.: Technology’s In-Betweeness. Philosophy and Technology 26(2), 111–115 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Greenleaf, G., Mowbray, A., Chung, P.: The meaning of ’free access to legal information’:A twenty year evolution’ (on LSN) Law via Internet Conference, Cornell University, Ithica, USA (October 2012)

    Google Scholar 

27. Ha, H., Coghill, K.: Online shoppers in Australia: dealing with problems. International Journal of Consumer Studies 32, 5–17 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

28. Harris, C.G., Srinivasan, P.: Ethics and Crowdsourcing. In: Altshuler, Y. (ed.) Security and Privacy in Social Networks, pp. 67–83. Springer, Dordrecht (2013)

    Google Scholar 

29. van der Herik, J., Dimov, D.: Towards Crowdsourced Online Dispute Resolution. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology 7(2), 99–111 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

30. Hörnle, J.: Encouraging Online Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU and Beyond. European Law Review 38, 187–208 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

31. Kannai, R., Schild, U., Zeleznikow, J.: Modeling the evolution of legal discretion – an Artificial Intelligence Approach. Ratio Juris 20(4), 530–558 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Kersten, G.E., Vahidov, R., Arno, R.: Lodder and John Zeleznikow: Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology. Group Decision and Negotiation 2, 525–530 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Kittur, A., Nickerson, J.V., Bernstein, M.S., et al.: The Future of Crowd Work. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSWC 2013, pp. 1301–1318. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

34. Langheinrich, M.: Privacy by Design - Principles of Privacy-Aware Ubiquitous Systems. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, pp. 273–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

35. Larson, M.: Crowdsourcing: From Theory to Practice and Long-Term Perspectives. Dagstuhl, September 1-4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

36. Letia, L., Groza, A.: Planning with argumentation schemes in online dispute resolution. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, pp. 17–24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

37. Lodder, A.: The Third Party and Beyond. An Analysis of the Different Parties, in particular The Fifth, Involved in Online Dispute Resolution. Information & Communications Technology Law 15(2), 143–155 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Systems in a Three Step Model. The Harvard Negotiation Law Review 10, 287–338 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

39. Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Enhanced Dispute Resolution Through the Use of Information Technology. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

40. Mars de, J., Exon, S.N., Kovach, K., Rule, C.: Virtual Virtues: Ethical Considerations for an Online Dispute Resolution Practice. Dispute Resolution Magazine 17(1), 6–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

41. Marshall, C.C., Shipman, F.M.: Experiences Surveying the Crowd: Reflections on Methods, Participation, and Reliability. In: WebSci 2013, Paris, France, May 2-4, pp. 234–243. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

42. Meier, P.: On Crowdsourcing, Crisis Mapping and Data Protection Standards (2012), http://irevolution.net/2012/02/05/iom-data-protection/

43. Noriega, P., Chopra, A.K., Fornara, N., Lopes Cardoso, H., Singh, M.: Regulated MAS: Social Perspective. Normative Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 93-134 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

44. Ossowksi, S. (ed.): Agreement Technologies. LGTS. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

45. Poblet, M.: Spread the word: the value of local information in disaster response. The Conversation (January 17, 2013), http://theconversation.com/spread-the-word-the-value-of-local-information-in-disaster-response-11626

46. Poblet, M., Leshinsky, R., Zeleznikow, J.: Digital neighbours: Even Good Samaritan crisis mappers need strategies for legal liability. Planning News. 38(11), 20–21 (2012), http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=002163980680827;res=IELBUS

    Google Scholar 

47. Reay, I., Dick, S., Miller, J.: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of P3P Privacy Policies: Stated Actions vs. Legal Obligations. ACM Transactions on The Web 3(2), Art. 6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

48. Rizza, C., Guimarães, A., Chiaramello, M., Curvelo, P.: Do-it-yourself justice considerations of social media use in a crisis situation: the case of the 2011 Vancouver riots. In: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 720–721. IEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

49. Rule, C., Friedberg, L.: The appropriate role of dispute resolution in building trust online. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13, 193–205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. Rule, C., Rogers, V.: Building a Global System for Resolving High-Volume, Low-Value Cases. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 29(7), 135–136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

51. Schultz, T.: Private Legal Systems: What Cyberspace Might Teach Legal Theorists. Yale Journal of Law & Technology 10, 151–193 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

52. Schultz, T.: The Roles of Dispute Settlement and ODR. In: Arnold Ingen-Housz, K. (ed.) ADR In Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures, vol. 2, pp. 135–155. Kluwer, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

53. Schultz, T.: Internet Disputes, Fairness in Arbitration and Transnationalism: A Reply to Julia Hörnle. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 19(2), 153–163 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. Turel, O.: Predictors of disputants’ intentions to use online dispute resolution services: the roles of justice and trust. Doctoral Dissertation. Canada, McMaster University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

55. Turilli, M.: Ethical Protocols Design. Ethics and Information Technology 9, 49–62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. Wahab, M.S.A., Katsh, E., Rainey, D. (eds.): Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice A Treatise on Technology and ODR. Eleven International Publishing, The Netherlands (2012)

    Google Scholar 

57. Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom Atheneum, N.Y (1967)

    Google Scholar 

58. Ye, Q.: Research on Disputes about the Reputation Right in Networks, E-Business and Information System Security. In: EBISS 2009. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

59. Zeleznikow, J.: Methods for incorporating fairness into the development of an online family dispute resolution environment. Alternative Dispute Resolution Journal 22, 16–21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

60. Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E.: Legal fairness in ADR processes – implications for research and teaching. Alternative Dispute Resolution Journal 23, 265–273 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references