Evaluating Supervised Semantic Parsing Methods on Application-Independent Data

1. Wong, Y.W., Mooney, R.: Learning synchronous grammars for semantic parsing with lambda calculus. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 960–967. Association for Computational Linguistics (June 2007)

   Google Scholar 

2. Bos, J.: Wide-coverage semantic analysis with boxer. In: Semantics in Text Processing, STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings. Research in Computational Semantics, vol. 1, pp. 277–286. College Publications (2008)

   Google Scholar 

3. Le, P., Zuidema, W.: Learning compositional semantics for open domain semantic parsing. In: Proceedings of COLING 2012, Mumbai, India, pp. 1535–1552. The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee (December 2012)

   Google Scholar 

4. Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht (December 1993)

   Google Scholar 

5. Basile, V., Bos, J., Evang, K., Venhuizen, N.: Developing a large semantically annotated corpus. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Doğan, M.U., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 3196–3200. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2012); ACL Anthology Identifier: L12-1299

   Google Scholar 

6. Ide, N., Baker, C., Fellbaum, C., Passonneau, R.: The manually annotated subcorpus: A community resource for and by the people. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 68–73. Association for Computational Linguistics (July 2010)

   Google Scholar 

7. Lu, W., Ng, H.T., Lee, W.S., Zettlemoyer, L.S.: A generative model for parsing natural language to meaning representations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 783–792 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

8. Kwiatkowski, T., Zettlemoyer, L., Goldwater, S., Steedman, M.: Inducing probabilistic CCG grammars from logical form with higher-order unification. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1223–1233. Association for Computational Linguistics (October 2010)

   Google Scholar 

9. Liang, P., Jordan, M., Klein, D.: Learning dependency-based compositional semantics. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 590–599. Association for Computational Linguistics (June 2011)

   Google Scholar 

10. Alshawi, H., Chang, P.C., Ringgaard, M.: Deterministic statistical mapping of sentences to underspecified semantics. In: Bos, J., Pulman, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2011), Oxford, UK, pp. 15–24 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

11. Richter, F., Sailer, M.: Basic concepts of lexical resource semantics. In: Collegium Logicum. ESSLLI 2003 - Course Material I. Collegium Logicum, vol. 5, pp. 87–143. Kurt Gödel Society, Wien (2004)

    Google Scholar 

12. Shieber, S.M.: The problem of logical-form equivalence. Computational Linguistics 19(1), 179–190 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

13. Allen, J.F., Swift, M., de Beaumont, W.: Deep semantic analysis of text. In: Bos, J., Delmonte, R. (eds.) Semantics in Text Processing, STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings. Research in Computational Semantics, vol. 1, pp. 343–354. College Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

14. Steedman, M.: The Syntactic Process. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references