Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Verifiable Postal Voting

  • Conference paper
Security Protocols XXI (Security Protocols 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8263))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This proposal aims to combine the best properties of paper-based and end-to-end verifiable remote voting systems. Ballots are delivered electronically to voters, who return their votes on paper together with some cryptographic information that allows them to verify later that their votes were correctly included and counted.

We emphasise the ease of the voter’s experience, which is not much harder than basic electronic delivery and postal returns. A typical voter needs only to perform a simple check that the human-readable printout reflects the intended vote. The only extra work is adding some cryptographic information into the same envelope as the human-readable vote.

The proposed scheme is not strictly end-to-end verifiable, because it depends on procedural assumptions at the point where the ballots are received. These procedures should be public and could be enforced by a group of observers, but are not publicly verifiable afterwards by observers who were absent at the time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adida, B.: Helios: Web-based Open-Audit Voting (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benaloh, J., Byrne, M., Kortum, P., McBurnett, N., Pereira, O., Stark, P.B., Wallach, D.S.: Star-vote: A secure, transparent, auditable, and reliable voting system (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benaloh, J.: Simple verifiable elections. In: Proc. 1st USENIX Accurate Electronic Voting Technology Workshop (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benaloh, J., Jones, D., Lazarus, E., Lindeman, M., Stark, P.B.: Soba: Secrecy-preserving observable ballot-level audit. In: Proc. USENIX Accurate Electronic Voting Technology Workshop (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cramer, R., Gennaro, R., Schoenmakers, B.: A secure and optimally efficient multi-authority election scheme. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 103–118. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaum, D.: SureVote: Technical Overview. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Trustworthy Elections, WOTE 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gjsteen, K.: Analysis of an internet voting protocol. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2010/380 (2010), http://eprint.iacr.org/

  8. Heather, J., Ryan, P.Y.A., Teague, V.: Pretty good democracy for more expressive voting schemes. In: Gritzalis, D., Preneel, B., Theoharidou, M. (eds.) ESORICS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6345, pp. 405–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakobsson, M., Juels, A., Rivest, R.: Making Mix Nets Robust for Electronic Voting by Randomized Partial Checking. In: USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 339–353 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, D.W., Simons, B.: Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count? University of Chicago Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moran, T., Naor, M.: Split-ballot voting: Everlasting privacy with distributed trust. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 13, 16:1–16:43 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan, P.Y.A., Teague, V.: Pretty Good Deomcracy. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Workshop on Security Protocols 2009 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen, A., Ta-shma, A., Riva, B., Ben-Nun, J.(Y.): Wombat voting system

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sako, K., Kilian, J.: Receipt-free mix-type voting scheme. In: Guillou, L.C., Quisquater, J.-J. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 1995. LNCS, vol. 921, pp. 393–403. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Zagórski, F., Carback, R.T., Chaum, D., Clark, J., Essex, A., Vora, P.L.: Remotegrity: Design and use of an end-to-end verifiable remote voting system. In: Jacobson, M., Locasto, M., Mohassel, P., Safavi-Naini, R. (eds.) ACNS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7954, pp. 441–457. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Benaloh, J., Ryan, P.Y.A., Teague, V. (2013). Verifiable Postal Voting. In: Christianson, B., Malcolm, J., Stajano, F., Anderson, J., Bonneau, J. (eds) Security Protocols XXI. Security Protocols 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8263. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41717-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41717-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41716-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41717-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics