Abstract
Design models must abide by constraints that can come from diverse sources, like metamodels, requirements, or the problem domain. Modelers intent to live by these constraints and thus desire automated mechanism that provide instant feedback on constraint violations. However, typical approaches assume that constraints do not evolve over time, which, unfortunately, is becoming increasingly unrealistic. For example, the co-evolution of metamodels and models requires corresponding constraints to be co-evolved continuously. This demands efficient constraint adaptation mechanisms to ensure that validated constraints are up-to-date. This paper presents an approach based on constraint templates that tackles this evolution scenario by automatically updating constraints. We developed the Cross-Layer Modeler (XLM) approach which relies on incremental consistency-checking. As a case study, we performed evolutions of the UML-metamodel and 21 design models. Our approach is sound and the empirical evaluation shows that it is near instant and scales with increasing model sizes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schmidt, D.C.: Guest editor’s introduction: Model-driven engineering. IEEE Computer 39(2), 25–31 (2006)
Manders, E.-J., Biswas, G., Mahadevan, N., Karsai, G.: Component-oriented modeling of hybrid dynamic systems using the generic modeling environment. In: MOMPES 2012, pp. 159–168 (2006)
Ossher, H., Bellamy, R.K.E., Simmonds, I., Amid, D., Anaby-Tavor, A., Callery, M., Desmond, M., de Vries, J., Fisher, A., Krasikov, S.: Flexible modeling tools for pre-requirements analysis: conceptual architecture and research challenges. In: OOPSLA, pp. 848–864 (2010)
Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Benz, S., Juergens, E.: COPE - automating coupled evolution of metamodels and models. In: Drossopoulou, S. (ed.) ECOOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5653, pp. 52–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language (UML), http://www.uml.org/
Pardillo, J.: A systematic review on the definition of UML profiles. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6394, pp. 407–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Vierhauser, M., Grünbacher, P., Egyed, A., Rabiser, R., Heider, W.: Flexible and scalable consistency checking on product line variability models. In: ASE, pp. 63–72 (2010)
Reder, A., Egyed, A.: Model/analyzer: a tool for detecting, visualizing and fixing design errors in UML. In: ASE, pp. 347–348 (2010)
Object Management Group. Object Constraint Language (OCL), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/
Demuth, A., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Egyed, A.: Automatically generating and adapting model constraints to support co-evolution of design models. In: ASE, pp. 302–305 (2012)
Demuth, A., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Egyed, A.: Cross-layer modeler: A tool for flexible multilevel modeling with consistency checking. In: ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 452–455 (2011), http://www.sea.jku.at/tools/xlm
Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF), http://eclipse.org/modeling/emf/
Büttner, F., Bauerdick, H., Gogolla, M.: Towards transformation of integrity constraints and database states. In: DEXA Workshops, pp. 823–828 (2005)
Egyed, A.: Instant consistency checking for the UML. In: ICSE, pp. 381–390 (2006)
Blanc, X., Mougenot, A., Mounier, I., Mens, T.: Incremental detection of model inconsistencies based on model operations. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Egyed, A.: Automatically detecting and tracking inconsistencies in software design models. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 37(2), 188–204 (2011)
Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A.: Automating co-evolution in model-driven engineering. In: EDOC, pp. 222–231 (2008)
Hassam, K., Sadou, S., Gloahec, V.L., Fleurquin, R.: Assistance system for OCL constraints adaptation during metamodel evolution. In: CSMR, pp. 151–160 (2011)
Marković, S., Baar, T.: Refactoring OCL annotated UML class diagrams. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 280–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sunyé, G., Pollet, D., Le Traon, Y., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Refactoring UML models. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Wachsmuth, G.: Metamodel adaptation and model co-adaptation. In: Ernst, E. (ed.) ECOOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4609, pp. 600–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Groher, I., Reder, A., Egyed, A.: Incremental consistency checking of dynamic constraints. In: Rosenblum, D.S., Taentzer, G. (eds.) FASE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6013, pp. 203–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Demuth, A., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Egyed, A.: Constraint-driven modeling through transformation. In: Hu, Z., de Lara, J. (eds.) ICMT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7307, pp. 248–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Egyed, A., Letier, E., Finkelstein, A.: Generating and evaluating choices for fixing inconsistencies in UML design models. In: ASE, pp. 99–108 (2008)
Reder, A., Egyed, A.: Computing repair trees for resolving inconsistencies in design models. In: ASE, pp. 220–229 (2012)
Nentwich, C., Emmerich, W., Finkelstein, A.: Consistency management with repair actions. In: ICSE, pp. 455–464 (2003)
Mens, T., Wermelinger, M., Ducasse, S., Demeyer, S., Hirschfeld, R., Jazayeri, M.: Challenges in software evolution. In: IWPSE, pp. 13–22 (2005)
Cicchetti, A., Ruscio, D.D., Pierantonio, A.: Managing dependent changes in coupled evolution. In: ICMT, pp. 35–51 (2009)
Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Benz, S., Juergens, E.: Automatability of coupled evolution of metamodels and models in practice. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 645–659. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Wimmer, M., Kusel, A., Schönböck, J., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W., Kappel, G.: On using inplace transformations for model co-evolution. In: MtATL. INRIA & Ecole des Mines de Nantes (2010)
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: UML 2001, pp. 19–33 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Demuth, A., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Egyed, A. (2013). Supporting the Co-evolution of Metamodels and Constraints through Incremental Constraint Management. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41532-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41533-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)