Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

The Biometric Menagerie – A Fuzzy and Inconsistent Concept

  • Conference paper
Soft Computing Applications

Abstract

This paper proves that in iris recognition, the concepts of sheep, goats, lambs and wolves - as proposed by Doddington and Yager in the so-called Biometric Menagerie, are at most fuzzy and at least not quite well defined. They depend not only on the users or on their biometric templates, but also on the parameters that calibrate the iris recognition system. This paper shows that, in the case of iris recognition, the extensions of these concepts have very unsharp and unstable (non-stationary) boundaries. The membership of a user to these categories is more often expressed as a degree (as a fuzzy value) rather than as a crisp value. Moreover, they are defined by fuzzy Sugeno rules instead of classical (crisp) definitions. For these reasons, we said that the Biometric Menagerie proposed by Doddington and Yager could be at most a fuzzy concept of biometry, but even this status is conditioned by improving its definition. All of these facts are confirmed experimentally in a series of 12 exhaustive iris recognition tests undertaken for University of Bath Iris Image Database while using three different iris code dimensions (256x16, 128x8 and 64x4), two different iris texture encoders (Log Gabor and Haar Hilbert) and two different types of safety models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M., Barbulescu, A.: Combined Haar-Hilbert and Log-Gabor Based Iris Encoders. In: Balas, V.E., Fodor, J., Varkonyi-Koczy, A. (eds.) New Concepts and Applications in Soft Computing. SCI, vol. 417, pp. 1–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Doddington, G., Liggett, W., Martin, A., Przybocki, M., Reynolds, D.: Sheep, Goats, Lambs and Wolves. In: A Statistical Analysis of Speaker Performance in the NIST 1998 Speaker Recognition Evaluation. In: Int’l Conf. Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Sydney, vol. 4, pp. 1351–1354 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iris Challenge Evaluation, N.I.S.T. retired Mars (2011), http://iris.nist.gov/ice/

  4. Paone, J., Flynn, P.: On the consistency of the biometric menagerie for irises and iris matchers. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), pp. 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Popescu-Bodorin, N.: Exploring New Directions in Iris Recognition. In: 11th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing. Conference Publishing Services – IEEE Computer Society, pp. 384–391 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E.: Comparing Haar-Hilbert and Log-Gabor based iris encoders on Bath Iris Image Database. In: Proc. 4th Int. Work. on Soft Computing Apps., pp. 191–196. IEEE Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Popescu-Bodorin, N.: Processing Toolbox for the University of Bath Iris Image Database, PT-UBIID-v.02 (2010), http://fmi.spiruharet.ro/bodorin/pt-ubiid/

  8. Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M.: 8-Valent Fuzzy Logic for Iris Recognition and Biometry. In: Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Floriana, Malta, September 15-17, pp. 149–154. IEEE Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M.: Iris Codes Classification Using Discriminant and Witness Directions. In: Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Floriana, Malta, September 15-17, pp. 143–148. IEEE Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bath University Iris Image Database, http://www.smartsensors.co.uk/informations/bath-iris-image-database/

  11. Sugeno, M., Yasukawa, T.: A Fuzzy-Logic-Based Approach to Qualitative Modeling. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 1(1), 7–31 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yager, N., Dunstone, T.: The biometric menagerie. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32(2), 220–230 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L.A.: A New Direction in AI - Toward a Computational Theory of Perceptions. AI Magazine 22(1), 73–84 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zadeh, L.A.: Toward extended fuzzy logic A first step. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160, 3175–3181 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolaie Popescu-Bodorin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M. (2013). The Biometric Menagerie – A Fuzzy and Inconsistent Concept. In: Balas, V., Fodor, J., Várkonyi-Kóczy, A., Dombi, J., Jain, L. (eds) Soft Computing Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33941-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33941-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33941-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics