Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Methods for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Are Not Necessarily Valid for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Detection in Screening Mammography

  • Conference paper
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7361))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2754 Accesses

Abstract

It is important that the clinical effectiveness of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems be evaluated. Since CADe is used to improve the effectiveness of screening mammography, it might be expected that the same methods and endpoints that are used to evaluate screening mammography can be used to evaluated screening mammography when CADe is used. Unfortunately, this is not always true and when the assumption fails, erroneous conclusions are often made. In clinical studies the choice of endpoints, estimation of sensitivity, and the significance of DCIS are potential problem areas. Further, the use of ROC versus FROC can affect the measured performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freer, T.W., Ulissey, M.J.: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220, 781–786 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gur, D., Sumkin, J.H., Rockette, H.E., Ganott, M., Hakim, C., Hardesty, L., Poller, W.R., Shah, R., Wallace, L.: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-Aided detection system. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96, 185–190 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helvie, M.A., Hadjiiski, L., Makariou, E., Chan, H.-P., Petrick, N., Sahiner, B., Lo, S.-C.B., Freedman, M., Adler, D., Bailey, J., Blane, C., Hoff, D., Hunt, K., Joynt, L., Klein, K., Paramagul, C., Patterson, S.K., Roubidoux, M.A.: Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection. Radiology 231, 208–214 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birdwell, R.L., Bandodkar, P., Ikeda, D.M.: Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 236, 451–457 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cupples, T.E., Cunningham, J.E., Reynolds, J.C.: Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 185, 944–950 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khoo, L.A., Taylor, P., Given-Wilson, R.M.: Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 237, 444–449 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dean, J.C., Ilvento, C.C.: Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 187, 20–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ko, J.M., Nicholas, M.J., Mendel, J.B., Slanetz, P.J.: Prospective Assessment of Computer-Aided Detection in Interpretation of Screening Mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 187, 1483–1491 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morton, M.J., Whaley, D.H., Brandt, K.R., Amrami, K.K.: Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection–prospective evaluation. Radiology 239, 375–383 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton, J.J., Taplin, S.H., Carney, P.A., Abraham, L., Sickles, E.A., D’Orsi, C., Berns, E.A., Cutter, G., Hendrick, R.E., Barlow, W.E., Elmore, J.G.: Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. The New England Journal of Medicine 356, 1399–1409 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Georgian-Smith, D., Moore, R.H., Halpern, E., Yeh, E.D., Rafferty, E.A., D’Alessandro, H.A., Staffa, M., Hall, D.A., McCarthy, K.A., Kopans, D.B.: Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 189, 1135–1141 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbert, F.J., Astley, S.M., Gillan, M.G., Agbaje, O.F., Wallis, M.G., James, J., Boggis, C.R., Duffy, S.W.: Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. The New England Journal of Medicine 359, 1675–1684 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilbert, F.J., Astley, S.M., Gillan, M.G., Agbaje, O.F., Wallis, M.G., James, J., Boggis, C.R., Duffy, S.W.: Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. The New England Journal of Medicine 359, 1675–1684 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gromet, M.: Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. American Journal of Radiology 190, 854–859 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fenton, J.J., Abraham, L., Taplin, S.H., Geller, B.M., Carney, P.A., D’Orsi, C., Elmore, J.G., Barlow, W.E.: For the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium: Effectiveness of Com-puter-Aided Detection in Community Mammography Practice. JNCI 103, 1152–1161 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciatto, S., Rosselli Del Turco, M., Burke, P., Visioli, C., Paci, E., Zappa, M.: Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. British Journal of Cancer 89, 1645–1649 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert, F.J., Astley, S.M., McGee, M.A., Gillan, M.G., Boggis, C.R., Griffiths, P.M., Duffy, S.W.: Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 241, 47–53 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishikawa, R., Schmidt, R., Linvers, M., Edwards, A., Papaioannou, J., Stull, M.: Clinically Missed Cancers: How Effectively Can Radiologists Use Computer-Aided Detection (CADe). American Journal of Roentgenology (2011) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor, P., Champness, J., Given-Wilson, R., Johnston, K., Potts, H.: Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. Health Technol. Assess. 9, 1–70 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nishikawa, R.M., Pesce, L.L.: Computer-aided detection evaluation methods are not created equal. Radiology 251, 634–636 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor, P., Potts, H.W.: Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur. J. Cancer 44, 798–807 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noble, M., Bruening, W., Uhl, S., Schoelles, K.: Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 279, 881–890 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eadie, L.H., Taylor, P., Gibson, A.P.: A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. European Journal of Radiology 81, e70–e76 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hall, F.M.: Breast imaging and computer-aided detection. The New England Journal of Medicine 356, 1464–1466 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nishikawa, R.M. (2012). Methods for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Are Not Necessarily Valid for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Detection in Screening Mammography. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_91

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_91

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics