Abstract
Image quality in digital mammography can be achieved by conducting periodic tests. It is recommended that some quality parameters be measured from images acquired by exposing specific phantoms, as CDMAM 3.4, in such systems. Whereas this task is hard-working and time consuming, this study has attempted to develop and compare two computational methods in order to assist the technical professional in performing the tests with such phantom images, reducing the subjectivity due to the observers. Tests used 27 phantom images obtained from six different digital mammography systems – five CR-type and one DR-type. Both methods proved to be effective in detecting structures. However, the first one allowed the complete image processing and not just a region of interest, which makes it quite advantageous.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bijker, K.R., Thijssen, M.A.O., Arnoldussen, T.J.M.: Manual of CDMAM-phantom type 3.4. University Medical Centre Nijmegen, St. Radboud (2002)
Perry, N., Broeders, M., Wolf, C., Törnberg, S., Holland, R., Von Karsa, L.: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening and Diagnosis, 4th edn. European Communities, Luxembourg (2006)
Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M.A.O.: Determination of contrast-detail curves of mammography systems by automated image analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 155–160. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)
Hummel, et al.: Factors for conversion between human and automatic read-outs of CDMAM images. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 2011: Physics of Medical Imaging (2011)
Monnin, et al.: Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 4221–4238 (2011)
Tseng, Huang: Automatic thresholding based on human visual perception. Image and Vision Computing 11(9) (1993)
Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2002)
Buchsbaum, G.: An analytical derivation of visual nonlinearity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 27, 237–242 (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sousa, M.A.Z., Schiabel, H., Medeiros, R.B. (2012). Development of Computer Techniques Designed to Aid Tests of Digital Mammography Systems Quality Evaluation with the Phantom CDMAM 3.4. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_64
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_64
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)