Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Privacy Preservation Using Multi-context Systems and Default Logic

  • Chapter
Correct Reasoning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7265))

  • 1101 Accesses

Abstract

Preserving the privacy of sensitive data is one of the major challenges the information society has to face. Traditional approaches focused on infrastructures for identifying data which is to be kept private and for managing access rights to these data. However, although these efforts are useful, they do not address an important aspect: While the sensitive data itself can be protected nicely using these mechanisms, related data, which is deemed insensitive per se, may be used to infer sensitive data. This inference can be achieved by combining insensitive data or by exploiting specific background knowledge of the domain of discourse. In this paper, we present a general formalization of this problem and two particular instantiations of it. The first supports query answering by means of multi-context systems and hybrid knowledge bases, while the second allows for query answering by using default logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bairakdar, S.E., Dao-Tran, M., Eiter, T., Fink, M., Krennwallner, T.: The DMCS Solver for Distributed Nonmonotonic Multi-Context Systems. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds.) JELIA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6341, pp. 352–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, C., Subrahmanian, V.: Dualities Between Alternative Semantics for Logic Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Journal of Automated Reasoning 10(3), 399–420 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benton, J., Subrahmanian, V.: Hybrid Knowledge Bases for Missile Siting Applications. In: IEEE Conference on AI Applications, pp. 141–148 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bögl, M., Eiter, T., Fink, M., Schüller, P.: The mcs-ie System for Explaining Inconsistency in Multi-Context Systems. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds.) JELIA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6341, pp. 356–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonatti, P.A., Kraus, S., Subrahmanian, V.: Foundations of secure deductive databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 7(3), 406–422 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G., Dix, J., Konolige, K.: Nonmonotonic Reasoning: An Overview. CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 73. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Equilibria in Heterogeneous Nonmonotonic Multi-Context Systems. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007), pp. 385–390. AAAI Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cadoli, M., Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: Default Logic as a Query Language. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 9(3), 448–463 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dix, J.: Default Theories of Poole-Type and a Method for Constructing Cumulative Versions of Default Logic. In: Neumann, B. (ed.) Proc. of 10th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence ECAI 1992, pp. 289–293. John Wiley & Sons (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dix, J., Faber, W., Subrahmanian, V.: The Relationship between Reasoning about Privacy and Default Logics. In: Sutcliffe, G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3835, pp. 637–650. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Schüller, P., Weinzierl, A.: Finding Explanations of Inconsistency in Multi-Context Systems. In: Lin, F., Sattler, U., Truszczyński, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faber, W.: Privacy Preservation Using Multi-Context Systems. In: Mileo, A., Fink, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Logic-based Interpretation of Context: Modeling and Applications, May 2011, pp. 45–51 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: A New Perspective on Stable Models. In: Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), pp. 372–379 (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gottlob, G.: Complexity Results for Nonmonotonic Logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(3), 397–425 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gottlob, G., Leone, N., Veith, H.: Succinctness as a Source of Expression Complexity. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 97(1-3), 231–260 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kautz, H., Selman, B.: Hard Problems for Simple Default Logics. Artificial Intelligence 49, 243–279 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, J., Nerode, A., Subrahmanian, V.: Hybrid Knowedge Bases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 8(3), 773–785 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marek, W., Truszczyński, M.: Nonmonotonic Logics; Context-Dependent Reasoning, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Reiter, R.: A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2), 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Stillman, J.: It’s Not My Default: The Complexity of Membership Problems in Restricted Propositional Default Logic. In: Proceedings AAAI 1990, pp. 571–579 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stillman, J.: The Complexity of Propositional Default Logic. In: Proceedings AAAI 1992, pp. 794–799 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Subrahmanian, V.: Amalgamating Knowedge Bases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 19(2), 291–331 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Winslett, M., Smith, K., Qian, X.: Formal query languages for secure relational databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 19(4), 626–662 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, L., Qian, J., Chang, L., Cai, G.: Using ASP for knowledge management with user authorization. Data & Knowledge Engineering 69(8), 737–762 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dix, J., Faber, W., Subrahmanian, V.S. (2012). Privacy Preservation Using Multi-context Systems and Default Logic. In: Erdem, E., Lee, J., Lierler, Y., Pearce, D. (eds) Correct Reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7265. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30743-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30743-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30742-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30743-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics