Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Crowdsourcing for Industrial Problems

  • Conference paper
Citizen in Sensor Networks (CitiSens 2012)

Abstract

The generalized use of the Internet and social network platforms has changed the way human beings establish relations, collaborate and share resources. In this context, crowdsourcing (or crowd computing) is becoming a common solution to provide answers to complex problems by automatically coordinating the potential of machines and human beings working together. Several challenges still separate crowdsourcing from its generalized acceptance by industry. For instance, the quality delivered by the workers in the crowd is crucial and depends on different aspects such as their skills, experience, commitment, etc. Trusting the individuals in a social network and their capacity to carry out the different tasks assigned to them becomes essential in speeding up the adoption of this new technology in industrial environments. Capacity to deliver on time, cost or confidentiality are just some other possible obstacles to be removed. In this paper, we discuss some of these issues, provide solutions to improve the quality in systems based on the use of crowdsourcing and present a real industrial problem where we use the crowd to leverage the work capacity of geographically distributed human beings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banerjee, S., Lavie, A.: METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pp. 65–72. Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor (2005), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W05/W05-0909

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentivogli, L., Federico, M., Moretti, G., Paul, M.: Getting expert quality from the crowd for machine translation evaluation. In: MT Summit XIII, pp. 521–528 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, M.S., Little, G., Miller, R.C., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M.S., Karger, D.R., Crowell, D., Panovich, K.: Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside. In: Procs. of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 2010, New York, USA, pp. 313–322 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866078

  4. Denkowski, M., Lavie, A.: Exploring normalization techniques for human judgments of machine translation adequacy collected using amazon mechanical turk. In: Procs of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, CSLDAMT 2010, pp. 57–61. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2010), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1866696.1866705

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, Q., Vogel, S.: Consensus versus expertise: a case study of word alignment with mechanical turk. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, CSLDAMT 2010, pp. 30–34. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2010), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1866696.1866700

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R.C., Schader, M.: Managing the crowd: Towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. In: AMCIS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, C.: You’re Hired! An Examination of Crowdsourcing Incentive Models in Human Resource Tasks. In: Lease, M., Carvalho, V., Yilmaz, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Search and Data Mining (CSDM) at the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), Hong Kong, China, pp. 15–18 (February 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howe, J.: Wired 14.06: The Rise of Crowdsourcing, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html

  9. Kittur, A., Smus, B., Khamkar, S., Kraut, R.E.: Crowdforge: crowdsourcing complex work. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 2011, pp. 43–52. ACM, New York (2011), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2047196.2047202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lease, M., Yilmaz, E.: Crowdsourcing for information retrieval. SIGIR Forum 45(2), 66–75 (2012), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2093346.2093356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Negri, M., Bentivogli, L., Mehdad, Y., Giampiccolo, D., Marchetti, A.: Divide and conquer: crowdsourcing the creation of cross-lingual textual entailment corpora. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2011, pp. 670–679. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2145432.2145510

    Google Scholar 

  12. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2002, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 311–318 (2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073135

  13. Silberman, M.S., Irani, L., Ross, J.: Ethics and tactics of professional crowdwork. XRDS 17(2), 39–43 (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1869086.1869100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan, T., Kumar, V., Ganesan, D.: CrowdSearch: exploiting crowds for accurate. In: Intl. Conf. on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pp. 77–90. ACM, New York (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814443

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuen, M.C., King, I., Leung, K.S.: A Survey of Crowdsourcing Systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 766–773. IEEE (October 2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.203

  16. Zaidan, O.F., Callison-Burch, C.: Crowdsourcing Translation: Professional Quality from Non-Professionals. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 1220–1229 (June 2011), http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P11-1122.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muntés-Mulero, V., Paladini, P., Manzoor, J., Gritti, A., Larriba-Pey, JL., Mijnhardt, F. (2013). Crowdsourcing for Industrial Problems. In: Nin, J., Villatoro, D. (eds) Citizen in Sensor Networks. CitiSens 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7685. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36074-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36074-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36073-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36074-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics