Abstract
Trauma triage seeks to match injured patients with appropriate healthcare resources. Mistriage can be costly both in terms of money and lives. This paper proposes and evaluates a comprehensive model that uses both machine learning and data mining to support the process of trauma triage. The proposed model is more dynamic and adaptive than the typical guideline-based approach, and it incorporates a computer-assisted feedback loop to support clinician efforts to improve triage accuracy. This paper uses three years of retrospective data to compare multiple machine learning algorithms to the current standard triage decision guidelines. Then, the triage classifications from one of those experiments are used as input to demonstrate the potential of our data mining algorithm to provide a mapping between patient type and classifier performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bond, R.J., Kortbeek, J.B., Preshaw, R.M.: Field trauma triage: combining mechanism of injury with the prehospital index for an improved trauma triage tool. J. Trauma 43(2), 283–287 (1997)
Tamim, H., et al.: Field triage of trauma patients: improving on the Prehospital Index. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 20(3), 170–176 (2002)
Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient. American College of Surgeons, Chicago (2006)
Liberman, M., et al.: The association between trauma system and trauma center components and outcome in a mature regionalized trauma system. Surgery 137(6), 647–658 (2005)
Utter, G.H., et al.: Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured? J. Trauma. 60(3), 529–535 (2006)
Demetriades, D., et al.: The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries. Ann. Surg. 242(4), 512–517 (2005)
Demetriades, D., et al.: Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score > 15). J. Am. Coll. Surg. 202(2), 212–215 (2006)
Densmore, J.C., et al.: Outcomes and delivery of care in pediatric injury. J. Pediatr. Surg. 41(1), 92–98 (2004)
Champion, H.R., et al.: Trauma score. Crit Care Med. 9(9), 672–676 (1981)
Moreau, M., et al.: Application of the trauma score in the prehospital setting. Ann. Emerg. Med. 14(11), 1049–1054 (1985)
Champion, H.R., et al.: A revision of the Trauma Score. J. Trauma. 29(5), 623–629 (1989)
Clemmer, T.P., et al.: Prospective evaluation of the CRAMS scale for triaging major trauma. J. Trauma. 25(3), 188–191 (1985)
Gormican, S.P.: CRAMS scale: field triage of trauma victims. Ann. Emerg. Med. 11(3), 132–135 (1982)
Baxt, W.G., Jones, G., Fortlage, D.: The trauma triage rule: a new, resource-based approach to the prehospital identification of major trauma victims. Ann. Emerg. Med. 19(12), 1401–1406 (1990)
Rhee, K.J., Fisher Jr., C.J., Willitis, N.H.: The Rapid Acute Physiology Score. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 5(4), 278–282 (1987)
Al-Salamah, M.A., et al.: Initial emergency department trauma scores from the OPALS study: the case for the motor score in blunt trauma. Acad. Emerg. Med. 11(8), 834–842 (2004)
Scheetz, L.J.: Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage guidelines for the identification of major trauma in elderly motor vehicle crash victims. J. Emerg. Nurs. 29(2), 109–115 (2003)
Baez, A.A., Lane, P.L., Sorondo, B.: System compliance with out-of-hospital trauma triage criteria. J. Trauma. 54(2), 344–351 (2003)
Hannan, E.L., et al.: Physiologic trauma triage criteria in adult trauma patients: are they effective in saving lives by transporting patients to trauma centers? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 200(4), 584–592 (2005)
Santaniello, J.M., et al.: Mechanism of injury does not predict acuity or level of service need: field triage criteria revisited. Surgery 134(4), 698–703 (2003)
Gabbe, B.J., et al.: Prehospital prediction of intensive care unit stay and mortality in blunt trauma patients. J. Trauma. 59(2), 458–465 (2005)
Talbert, D.A., Honeycutt, M., Smith, A., Talbert, S.R.: An adaptive, population-sensitive trauma triage decision support model. In: Proc of the AMIA Annual Symposium (2009)
Honeycutt, M., Talbert, D.A., Talbert, S.R.: Interactive knowledge frontier discovery with COBWEB-KFD. In: Proc. Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) (2010)
Rimel, R.W., Jane, J.A., Edlich, R.F.: An injury severity scale for comprehensive management of central nervous system trauma. JACEP 8(2), 64–67 (1979)
Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)
Fawcett, T.: ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers. HP Labs Tech Report HPL-2003-4 (2003)
Bradley, A.P.: The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition 30(7), 1145–1159 (1997)
Talbert, S., Talbert, D.: A comparison of a decision tree induction algorithm with the ACS guidelines for trauma triage. In: AMIA Fall Symposium (2007)
R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2008)
Statnikov, A., Tsamardinos, I., Dosbayev, Y., Aliferis, C.F.: GEMS: a system for automated cancer diagnosis and biomarker discovery from microarray gene expression data. Int. J. Med. Inform. Aug. 74(7-8), 491–503 (2005)
Scheffer, T.: Error estimation and model selection. Ph.D. Thesis, Technischen Universitt Berlin, School of Computer Science (1999)
Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Joint Conf. on AI. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1995)
Fisher, D.: Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Machine Learning 2, 139–172 (1987)
Fisher, D.: Noise-tolerant conceptual clustering. In: Proc. of the Eleventh Int. Joint Conf. on AI. Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransico (1989)
Gluck, M., Corter, J.: Information, uncertainty, and the utility of categories. In: Proc of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1985)
Fisher, D.: Iterative optimization and simplification of hierarchical clusterings. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4, 147–180 (1996)
Kavek, B., Lavrac, N., Jovanoski, V.: Apriori-sd: Adapting association rule learning to subgroup discovery. In: R. Berthold, M., Lenz, H.-J., Bradley, E., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C. (eds.) IDA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2810, pp. 230–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Gamberger, D., Lavrac, N., Krstacic, A., Krstacic, G.: Clinical data analysis based on iterative subgroup discovery: experiments in brain ischaemia data analysis. Applied Intelligence 27(3), 205–217 (2007)
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1) (2009)
Breslow, L., Aha, D.: Simplifying decision trees: A survey. Tech report, Naval Research Laboratory (1996)
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall / CRC (1984)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Talbert, D.A., Honeycutt, M., Talbert, S. (2011). A Machine Learning and Data Mining Framework to Enable Evolutionary Improvement in Trauma Triage. In: Perner, P. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. MLDM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6871. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23199-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23199-5_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23198-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23199-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)