VAMEE: A Value Aware Method for Evaluating Inclusive E-Government Initiatives

1. Grönlund, Å.: Ten Years of E-Government: The ‘End of History’ and New Beginning. In: Wimmer, M.A., Chappelet, J.-L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6228, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. Gupta, M.P., Jana, D.: E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly 20, 365–387 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. European Commission, A Digital Agenda for Europe, http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:REV1:EN (viewed May 20, 2011)

4. Savas, E.S.: Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. CQ Press, Washington (2000)

   Google Scholar 

5. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, Local self-government, http://www.skl.se/artikel.asp?A=48688&C=6393 (viewed December 7, 2009)

6. Juell-Skielse, G., Perjons, E.: New Challenges for e-Government: Value Realization among Independent Actors. In: 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 437–445. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2010)

   Google Scholar 

7. CIO Council. The value measuring methodology: Highlights. Washington, DC7 CIO Council, Best Practices Committee (2001)

   Google Scholar 

8. E-Government Delegation. Vägledning i nyttorealisering, http://www.edelegationen.se/sites/default/files/imce/filer/publikationer/Vagledning_i_Nyttorealisering.pdf (viewed June 30, 2011)

9. Juell-Skielse, G., Perjons, E.: Improving E-Government through Benefit Analysis and Value Modeling. In: Ahamed, S.I., Bertino, E., Chang, C.K., Getov, V., Liu, L., Ming, H., Subramanyan, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2009, Seattle, Washington, USA, July 20-24, pp. 332–339. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Dahlgren, L.E., Lundgren, G., Stigberg, L.: Make IT profitable: PENG - A practical tool for financial evaluation of IT benefits, Ekerlids Förlag (1997)

    Google Scholar 

11. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce idea. Req. Engineering Journal 8(2), 114–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Dahlgren, L.E., Lundgren, G., Stigberg, L.: Öka nyttan av IT i vården!: att skapa och värdera nytta i verksamheten med hjälp av PENG-modellen, Ekerlids (2003) (In Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

13. Riesbeck, C.K., Schank, R.: Inside Case-based Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1989)

    Google Scholar 

14. Fredriksson, O.: Beyond Assessing Economic Net Value from Electronic Commerce-Supported Business Process Redesign − a Discussion of the PENG Method. In: Bubenko jr, J., Fischer-Hübner, S., Lindskog, S., Nilsson, A.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Promote IT 2004 Conference, May 5-7, pp. 382–393. Karlstad University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

15. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA Accounting Model: A Generalized Fra,ework for Accounting Systems in Shared Data Environment, The Accounting Review (1982)

    Google Scholar 

16. Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology, PhD thesis, HEC Lausanne (2004), http://www.hec.unil.ch/aosterwa/ (accessed January 5, 2008)

17. Yu, E.: Modeling Strategic relationships for process engineering. Dep. Of Computer Science, University of Toronto (1995)

    Google Scholar 

18. OMG Business Motivation Model, Version 1.1, Object Management Group (2010b), http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.1/,maj2010 (April 19, 2011)

19. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

20. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Weigand, H.: Resourse Analysis and Classification of Purpose Driven Value Model Design. Int. Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 1(1), 56–78

    Google Scholar 

22. Kohli, R., Hoadley, E.: Towards Developing a Framework for Measuring Organizational Impact of IT-Enabled BPR: Case Studies of Three Firms. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 37(1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

23. Becker, J., Bergener, P., Räckers, M.: Process-Based Governance in Public Administration Using Activity-Based Costing. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) EGOV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5693, pp. 176–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

24. Grimsley, M., Meehan, A.: e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 134–148 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Chircu, A.M.: E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework. Electronic Government 5(4), 345–363 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Irani, Z., Love, P., Elliman, T., Jones, S., Themistocleous, M.: Evaluating e-Government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal 15, 61–82 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references