A Meta-language for EA Information Modeling – State-of-the-Art and Requirements Elicitation

1. International Organization for Standardization: Iso/iec 42010:2007 systems and software engineering – recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (2007)

   Google Scholar 

2. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 32(1), 472–484 (1993)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Luftman, J.N.: Competing in the Information Age – Align in the Sand, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)

   Google Scholar 

4. Holschke, O., Närman, P., Flores, W.R., Eriksson, E., Schönherr, M.: Using enterprise architecture models and bayesian belief networks for failure impact analysis. In: Aier, S., Johnson, P., Schelp, J. (eds.) Pre-Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research, Sydney, Australia, pp. 33–46 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

5. Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M.: Enterprise Architecture – Models and Analyses for Information Systems Decision Making. Studentlitteratur, Pozkal, Poland (2007)

   Google Scholar 

6. Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.: An information model for managed application landscape evolution. Journal of Enterprise Architecture (JEA) 5(1), 12–26 (2009)

   Google Scholar 

7. The Open Group: TOGAF “Enterprise Edition” Version 9 (2009), http://www.togaf.org (cited 2010-02-25)

8. Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Lankes, J., Schneider, K., Schweda, C.M.: A pattern based approach for constructing enterprise architecture management information models. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2007, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 145–162. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe (2007)

   Google Scholar 

9. Frank, U.: The memo meta modelling language (mml) and language architecture (icb-research report). Technical report, Institut für Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik, Duisburg-Essen, Germany (2009)

   Google Scholar 

10. Lankhorst, M.: Introduction to enterprise architecture. In: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

11. Aier, S., Kurpjuweit, S., Riege, C., Saat, J.: Stakeholderorientierte documentation und analyse der unternehmensarchitektur. In: Hegering, H.G., Lehmann, A., Ohlbach, H.J., Scheideler, C. (eds.) GI Jahrestagung (2), Bonn, Germany, Gesellschaft für Informatik. LNI, vol. 134, pp. 559–565 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

12. NATO: Nato architecture framework version 3 (2007), http://www.nhqc3s.nato.int/ARCHITECTURE/_docs/NAF_v3/ANNEX1.pdf (cited 2010-02-25)

13. Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2008. Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

14. Object Management Group (OMG): Uml 2.2 superstructure specification (formal/2009-02-02) (2009), http://www.uml.org (cited 2010-02-25)

15. Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Schweda, C.M.: An extension to the essential meta-object facility (emof) for specifying and indicating dependencies between properties. Technical report, Technische Universität München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

16. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. PhD thesis, CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

17. Aier, S., Riege, C., Winter, R.: Unternehmensarchitektur – literaturüberblick stand der praxis. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(4), 292–304 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Language communities in enterprise architecture research. In: DESRIST 2009: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

19. Jonkers, H., van Burren, R., Arbab, F., de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., Bosma, H., ter Doest, H., Groenewegen, L., Scholten, J., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Iacob, M.E., Janssen, W., Lankhorst, M., van Leeuwen, D., Proper, E., Stam, A., van der Torre, L., van Zanten, G.: Towards a language for coherent enterprise architecture descriptions. In: 7th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2003), Brisbane, Australia. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

20. Jonkers, H., Goenewegen, L., Bonsangue, M., van Buuren, R.: A language for enterprise modelling. In: Lankhorst, M. (ed.) Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

21. Österle, H., Winter, R., Hoening, F., Kurpjuweit, S., Osl, P.: Der St. Galler Ansatz des Business Engineering: Das Core Business Metamodel. Wisu – Das Wirtschaftsstudium 2(36), 191–194 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

22. Kurpjuweit, S., Aier, S.: Ein allgemeiner Ansatz zur Ableitung von Abhängigkeitsanalysen auf Unternehmensarchitekturmodellen. In: 9. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2007), Wien, Austria, Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, pp. 129–138 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

23. Le, L.S., Wegmann, A.: Definition of an object-oriented modeling language for enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2005, p. 179c (2005)

    Google Scholar 

24. Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (memo) – conceptual framework and modeling languages. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2002), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1258–1267 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

25. Kirchner, L.: Eine Methode zur Unterstützung des IT-Managements im Rahmen der Unternehmensmodellierung. PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Berlin, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

26. Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., Schauer, H.: Designing and utilising business indicator systems within enterprise models – outline of a method. In: Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme (MobIS 2008) – Modellierung zwischen SOA und Compliance Management, November 27-28. Saarbrücken, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

27. OMG: Object constraint language (ocl) available specification, version 2.0 (formal/06-05-01) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

28. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Reducing accidental complexity in domain models. Software and Systems Modeling, 345–359 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

29. Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Technische Universität München: Eam pattern catalog wiki (2010), http://eampc-wiki.systemcartography.info (cited 2010-02-25)

30. OMG: Meta object facility (mof) core specification, version 2.0 (formal/06-01-01) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

31. Buckl, S., Franke, U., Holschke, O., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M., Sommestad, T., Ullberg, J.: A pattern-based approach to quantitative enterprise architecture analysis. In: 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), San Francisco, CA, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

32. Johnson, P., Johansson, E., Sommestad, T., Ullberg, J.: A tool for enterprise architecture analysis. In: 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007), Annapolis, Maryland, USA, October 15-19, pp. 142–156. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

33. Lankes, J., Schweda, C.M.: Using metrics to evaluate failure propagation and failure impacts in application landscapes. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Berlin, Germany, GITO-Verlag (2008)

    Google Scholar 

34. Fischer, R., Winter, R.: Ein hierarchischer, architekturbasierter ansatz zur unterstützung des it/business alignment. In: Oberweis, A., Weinhardt, C., Gimpel, H., Koschmider, A., Pankratius, V., Schnizler (eds.) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2007, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 163–180. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe (2007)

    Google Scholar 

35. Kurpjuweit, S.: Stakeholder-orientierte Modellierung und Analyse der Unternehmensarchitektur. PhD thesis, Universität St. Gallen (2009)

    Google Scholar 

36. Niemann, K.D.: From Enterprise Architecture to IT Governance – Elements of Effective IT Management. Vieweg+Teubner, Wiesbaden (2006)

    Google Scholar 

37. Yu, E., Strohmaier, M., Deng, X.: Exploring intentional modeling and analysis for enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of the EDOC 2006 Conference Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2006), Hong Kong, p. 32. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

38. van Buuren, R., Jonkers, H., Maria-Eugenia, S.P.: Composition of relations in enterprise architecture models. In: The second International Conference on Graph Transformation (ICGT), Roma, Italy, pp. 39–53 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

39. Englebert, V., Heymans, P.: Towards more extensible metacase tools. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 454–468. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

40. Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Technische Universität München: Eam pattern catalog wiki (2009), http://eampc-wiki.systemcartography.info (cited 2010-02-25)

41. Ernst, A.: Enterprise architecture management patterns. In: PLoP 2008: Proceedings of the Pattern Languages of Programs Conference 2008, Nashville, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

42. Noble, J.: Classifying relationships between object-oriented design patterns. In: Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC), pp. 98–107. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

43. Kamlah, W., Lorenzen, P.: Logische Propädeutik: Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens, 3rd edn., Metzler, Stuttgart, Germany (1996)

    Google Scholar 

44. Johnson, P., Nordström, L., Lagerström, R.: Formalizing analysis of enterprise architecture. In: Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications Conference, Bordeaux, France, p. 10. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

45. Aier, S., Buckl, S., Franke, U., Gleichauf, B., Johnson, P., Närman, P., Schweda, C.M., Ullberg, J.: A survival analysis of application life spans based on enterprise architecture models. In: 3rd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, Ulm, Germany, pp. 141–154 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references