Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Integrating Contrast in a Framework for Predicting Prosody

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2010)

Abstract

Information Structure (IS) is known to bear a significant effect on Prosody, making the identification of this effect crucial for improving the quality of synthetic speech. Recent theories identify contrast as a central IS element affecting accentuation. This paper presents the results of two experiments aiming to investigate the function of the different levels of contrast within the topic and focus of the utterance, and their effect on the prosody of Greek. Analysis showed that distinguishing between at least two contrast types is important for determining the appropriate accent type, and, therefore, such a distinction should be included in a description of the IS – Prosody interaction. For this description to be useful for practical applications, a framework is required that makes this information accessible to the speech synthesizer. This work reports on such a language-independent framework integration of all identified grammatical and syntactic prerequisites for creating a linguistically enriched input for speech synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arvaniti, A., Baltazani, M.: Intonational Analysis and Prosodic Annotation of Greek Spoken Corpora. In: Jun, S.-A. (ed.) Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, pp. 84–117. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baltazani, M., Jun, S.-A.: Focus and topic intonation in Greek. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 1305–1308 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Büring, D.: Semantics, Intonation and Information Structure. In: Ramchad, G., Reiss, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dretske, F.J.: Contrastive statements. The Philosophical Review 81, 411–437 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gussenhoven, C.: Types of Focus in English. In: Lee, C., Gordon, M., Büring, D. (eds.) Topic and Focus: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, pp. 83–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krifka, M.: Basic notions of information structure. In: Fery, C., Krifka, M. (eds.) Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure, Potsdam, vol. 6 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Leusen, N., Kalman, L.: The Interpretation of Free Focus. In: ILLC Computational Linguistics (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Molnár, V.: Contrast from a contrastive perspective. In: Kruiff- Korbayová, I., Steedman, M. (eds.) ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rooth, M.: A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rump, H., Collier, R.: Focus Conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Language & Speech 39, 1–17 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schwarzschild, R.: GIVENness, AvoidF and Other Constraints on the placement of Accent. Natural Language Semantics 7(2), 141–177 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Selkirk, E.: Contrastive Focus, Givenness and the Unmarked Status of “Discourse-New”. In: Féry, C., Fanselow, G., Krifka, M. (eds.) Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS), vol. 6, pp. 125–146. Universitätsverlag Potsdam, Potsdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steedman, M.: Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 649–689 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steedman, M.: Information-Structural Semantics of English Intonation. In: Gordon, M., Büring, D., Lee, C. (eds.) LSA Summer Institute Workshop on Topic and Focus, Santa Barbara, pp. 245–264. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vallduví, E.: The Informational Component. Garland Publishers, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vallduví, E., Vilkuna, M.: On Rheme and Kontrast. In: Culicover, P., Wagner, M. (eds.) Givenness and Locality. The Limits of Syntax, pp. 79–108. Academic Press, San Diego (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kiss, K.E.: Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74, 245–273 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, P., Black, A., Caley, R.: The architecture of the festival speech synthesis system. In: Proc. 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Australia, pp. 147–151 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pan, S., McKeown, K., Hirschberg, J.: Exploring features from natural language generation for prosody modeling. Computer Speech and Language 16, 457–490 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xydas, G., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Modeling Improved Prosody Generation from High-Level Linguistically Annotated Corpora. IEICE Trans. of Inf. and Syst., Special Section on Corpus-Based Speech Technologies 88(3), 510–518 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Black, A., Taylor, P.: Assigning intonation elements and prosodic phrasing for English speech synthesis from high level linguistic input. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 715–718 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spiliotopoulos, D., Petasis, G., Kouroupetroglou, G.: A Framework for Language-Independent Analysis and Prosodic Feature Annotation of Text Corpora. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5246, pp. 517–524. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stavropoulou, P., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G. (2010). Integrating Contrast in a Framework for Predicting Prosody. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6008. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12115-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12116-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics