Abstract
Information Structure (IS) is known to bear a significant effect on Prosody, making the identification of this effect crucial for improving the quality of synthetic speech. Recent theories identify contrast as a central IS element affecting accentuation. This paper presents the results of two experiments aiming to investigate the function of the different levels of contrast within the topic and focus of the utterance, and their effect on the prosody of Greek. Analysis showed that distinguishing between at least two contrast types is important for determining the appropriate accent type, and, therefore, such a distinction should be included in a description of the IS – Prosody interaction. For this description to be useful for practical applications, a framework is required that makes this information accessible to the speech synthesizer. This work reports on such a language-independent framework integration of all identified grammatical and syntactic prerequisites for creating a linguistically enriched input for speech synthesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvaniti, A., Baltazani, M.: Intonational Analysis and Prosodic Annotation of Greek Spoken Corpora. In: Jun, S.-A. (ed.) Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, pp. 84–117. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Baltazani, M., Jun, S.-A.: Focus and topic intonation in Greek. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 1305–1308 (1999)
Büring, D.: Semantics, Intonation and Information Structure. In: Ramchad, G., Reiss, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Dretske, F.J.: Contrastive statements. The Philosophical Review 81, 411–437 (1972)
Gussenhoven, C.: Types of Focus in English. In: Lee, C., Gordon, M., Büring, D. (eds.) Topic and Focus: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, pp. 83–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Krifka, M.: Basic notions of information structure. In: Fery, C., Krifka, M. (eds.) Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure, Potsdam, vol. 6 (2007)
Van Leusen, N., Kalman, L.: The Interpretation of Free Focus. In: ILLC Computational Linguistics (1993)
Molnár, V.: Contrast from a contrastive perspective. In: Kruiff- Korbayová, I., Steedman, M. (eds.) ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics (2001)
Rooth, M.: A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116 (2001)
Rump, H., Collier, R.: Focus Conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Language & Speech 39, 1–17 (1996)
Schwarzschild, R.: GIVENness, AvoidF and Other Constraints on the placement of Accent. Natural Language Semantics 7(2), 141–177 (1999)
Selkirk, E.: Contrastive Focus, Givenness and the Unmarked Status of “Discourse-New”. In: Féry, C., Fanselow, G., Krifka, M. (eds.) Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS), vol. 6, pp. 125–146. Universitätsverlag Potsdam, Potsdam (2007)
Steedman, M.: Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 649–689 (2000)
Steedman, M.: Information-Structural Semantics of English Intonation. In: Gordon, M., Büring, D., Lee, C. (eds.) LSA Summer Institute Workshop on Topic and Focus, Santa Barbara, pp. 245–264. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)
Vallduví, E.: The Informational Component. Garland Publishers, New York (1992)
Vallduví, E., Vilkuna, M.: On Rheme and Kontrast. In: Culicover, P., Wagner, M. (eds.) Givenness and Locality. The Limits of Syntax, pp. 79–108. Academic Press, San Diego (1998)
Kiss, K.E.: Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74, 245–273 (1998)
Taylor, P., Black, A., Caley, R.: The architecture of the festival speech synthesis system. In: Proc. 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Australia, pp. 147–151 (1998)
Pan, S., McKeown, K., Hirschberg, J.: Exploring features from natural language generation for prosody modeling. Computer Speech and Language 16, 457–490 (2002)
Xydas, G., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Modeling Improved Prosody Generation from High-Level Linguistically Annotated Corpora. IEICE Trans. of Inf. and Syst., Special Section on Corpus-Based Speech Technologies 88(3), 510–518 (2005)
Black, A., Taylor, P.: Assigning intonation elements and prosodic phrasing for English speech synthesis from high level linguistic input. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 715–718 (1994)
Spiliotopoulos, D., Petasis, G., Kouroupetroglou, G.: A Framework for Language-Independent Analysis and Prosodic Feature Annotation of Text Corpora. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5246, pp. 517–524. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stavropoulou, P., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G. (2010). Integrating Contrast in a Framework for Predicting Prosody. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6008. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_63
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12115-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12116-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)