Abstract
This paper describes a body of work developed over the past five years. The work addresses the use of Bayesian network (BN) models for representing and predicting social/organizational behaviors. The topics covered include model construction, validation, and use. These topics show the bulk of the lifetime of such model, beginning with construction, moving to validation and other aspects of model “critiquing”, and finally demonstrating how the modeling approach might be used to inform policy analysis. The primary benefits of using a well-developed computational, mathematical, and statistical modeling structure, such as BN, are 1) there are significant computational, theoretical and capability bases on which to build 2) the ability to empirically critique the model, and potentially evaluate competing models for a social/behavioral phenomenon.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jensen, F., Nielsen, T.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2007)
McCauley, C., Moskalenko, S.: Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 20, 416–433 (2008)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 4157, 1124–1131 (1974)
Renooij, S.: Probability Elicitation for Belief Networks: Issues to Consider. Knowledge Engineering Review 16, 255–269 (2001)
Green, P., Krieger, A., Wind, Y.: Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects. Interfaces 73, S56–S73 (2001)
Walsh, S., Dalton, A., White, A., Whitney, P.: Parameterizing Bayesian Network Representations of Social-Behavioral Models by Expert Elicitation: A Novel Application of Conjoint Analysis. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Current Issues in Predictive Approaches to Intelligent and Security Analytics (PAISA), pp. 227–232. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2010)
Cox, D., Hinkley, D.: Theoretical Statistics. Chapman & Hall, London (1974)
Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., Chickering, D.: Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data. Journal of Machine Learning 20, 197–243 (1995)
Riggelson, C.: Learning Parameters of Bayesian: Networks from Incomplete Data via Importance Sampling. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 42, 69–83 (2005)
Whitney, P., Walsh, S.: Calibrating Bayesian Network Representations of Social-Behavioral Models. In: Chai, S.-K., Salerno, J.J., Mabry, P.L. (eds.) SBP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6007, pp. 338–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Cleveland, W.: Visualizing Data. Hobart Press, Summit (1993)
Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior Dataset, http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar
Schum, D.: The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)
Coles, G.A., Brothers, A.J., Gastelum, Z.N., Thompson, S.E.: Utility of Social Modeling for Proliferation Assessment: Preliminary Assessment. PNNL 18438 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Whitney, P., White, A., Walsh, S., Dalton, A., Brothers, A. (2011). Bayesian Networks for Social Modeling. In: Salerno, J., Yang, S.J., Nau, D., Chai, SK. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6589. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19656-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19656-0_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19655-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19656-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)