Bio Inspired Swarm Algorithm for Tumor Detection in Digital Mammogram

1. Pisani, et al.: Outcome of Screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the phillipines. Int. J. Cancer (2006)

   Google Scholar 

2. Kopans, D.B.: Breast Imaging, pp. 81–95. J.B.Lippincoff, Philadelphia (1989)

   Google Scholar 

3. Romans, M.C.: Report from the Jacobs Institute – American Cancer Society Workshop on Mammogram screening and primary care providers, current issue, “women’s Health issues” Vol.2, pp. 169-172 (1992)

   Google Scholar 

4. Sahiner, B., et al.: Classificaiton of Mass and Normal Breast Tissue: A convolution Neural Network classifier with spatial domain and Texture Images. IEEE trans. on Medical Imaging 15(5), 598–609 (1996)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Liangei, et al.: A Study on Several Machine-Learning Methods for Classification of Malignant and Benign Clustered Microcalcificaitons. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 24(3), 371–380 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Cascio, D., et al.: Mammogram Segmentation by Contour Searching and Mass Lesions Classification with Neural Network. IEEE Trans. on Nuclear Science 53(5), 2827–2833 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Kim, J.K., Park, H.W.: Statistical Textural Features for Detection of MIcrocalcifications in Digitized Mammograms. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 18(3), 231–238 (1999)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Strickland, R.N., Hahn: Wavelet Transforms for Detecting Microcalcificaitons in Mammograms. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 15(2), 218–229 (1996)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Wang, T.C., et al.: Detection of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammograms Using Wavelets. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 1(4), 498–509 (1998)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Verma, B., Zakos, J.: A computer Aided Diagnosis System for Digital Mammogram Based on Fuzzy Neural and Feature Extraction Techniques. IEEE Trans, on Informaiton Technology in Biomedicine 5(1), 46–54 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hopse, R., Karssemeijer, N.: Use of Normal Tissue Context in Computer Aided Detection of masses in Mamograms. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 28(12), 2033–2041 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Ferlay, J., et al.: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. In: GLOBOCAN 2002, IARC cancer base No.5 version 2.0, IARC press, Lyon (2004)

    Google Scholar 

13. Yu, S.-N., Huang, Y.-K.: Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using combined model-based and statistical textural features. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 5461–5469 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2009-2010. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta (2009a)

    Google Scholar 

15. Gath, I., Geva, A.: Unsupervised Optimal Fuzzy Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11(7), 773–781 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Lorette, A., Descombes, X., Zerubia, J.: Fully Unsupervised Fuzzy Clustering with Entropy Criterion. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2000), vol. 3, pp. 3998–4001 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

17. Boujemaa: On Competitive Unsupervised Clustering. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2000), vol. 1, pp. 1631–1634 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

18. Frigui, H., Krishnapuram, R.: Clustering by Competitive Agglomeration. Pattern Recognition Letters 30(7), 1109–1119 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Suckling, J., Parker, J., et al.: The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop Digital mammography, ork, U.K., pp. 375–380 (July 1994)

    Google Scholar 

20. ISO/IEC FCD 15 444-1V1.0. (December 1999), http://www.jpeg.org/public/fcd15444-1.pdf

21. Ortega, A., Ramchandran, K.: Rate-distortion methods for image and video compression. IEEE Signal Processing Mag. 15, 23–50 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Antonini, M., Barlaud, M., Mathieu, P., Daubechies, I.: Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 1, 205–220 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Said, A., Pearlman, W.A.: A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Trans. Circuits, Syst. Video Technol. 6, 243–250 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Calderbank, R.C., Daubechies, I., Sweldens, W., Yeo, B.: Wavelet transforms that map integers to integers. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 5(3), 332–369 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

25. Zhang, B.: Histogram of Gabor Phase Patterns (HGPP): A Novel Object Representation Approach for Face Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16(1), 57–68 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

26. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

27. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Swarm Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

28. Engelbrecht, A.: Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

29. Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.: Parameter Selection in Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Evolutionary Programming VII: Proceedings of EP 2008, pp. 591–600 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

30. Subash, et al.: Detection of masses in Digital mammograms. International Journal of Computer and Network Security 2(2), 78–86 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

31. Liang, J.J., Suganthan, P.N.: Dynamic Multi-Swarm Particle Swarm Optimizer. In: IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Pasadena, CA, USA, pp. 124–129 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references