Abstract
Can all of the different approaches to software product line operation lead to quality core assets? Some organizations use a recognized method such as the Software Engineering Institute’s Framework for Product Line Practice [4] while others use a homegrown variant of their non-product line process. Some organizations iteratively mature their core assets while others build proactively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
In, H.P., Baik, J., Kim, S., Yang, Y., Boehm, B.: A quality-based cost estimation model for the product lin life cycle. Communications of the ACM 49(12) (2006)
McGregor, J.D.: The evolution of product line assets. Tech. rep., Software Engineering Institute (2003)
Myllärniemi, V., Männistö, T., Raatikainen, M.: Quality attribute variability within a software product family architecture. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures (2006)
SEI: Framework for software product line practice. Tech. rep., Software Engineering Institute (2010)
Völter, M., McGregor, J.D.: The model craftsman. Executive Update (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
McGregor, J.D. (2010). The Many Paths to Quality Core Assets. In: Bosch, J., Lee, J. (eds) Software Product Lines: Going Beyond. SPLC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6287. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15579-6_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15579-6_50
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15578-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15579-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)