Abstract
Why proofs are (usually) text based [1]if diagrams reduce inferential load [1]? The purpose of this poster is to explore ergonomic affordances of text that may encourage its use in proofs by building on prior work in attention [2,3]. We claim that textual notations may focus a reasoner’s “spotlight” of attention through serialized sequential chunks, whereas many diagrams may “diffuse” attention (enabling a reasoner to discern how elements fit together holistically, but with less focus on each element or reifying and explicitly representing connections/relationships between them).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tennant, N.: The Withering Away of Formal Semantics? Mind & Language 1, 302–318 (1986)
Scholl, B.J.: Objects and attention: the state of the art. Cognition 80, 46 (2001)
Treisman, A.M., Gelade, G.: A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136 (1980)
Shimojima, A., Katagiri, Y.: An Eye-Tracking Study of Exploitations of Spatial Constraints in Diagrammatic Reasoning. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, 74–88 (2008)
Ballard, D.H., Hayhoe, M.M., Pook, P.K., Rao, R.P.N.: Deictic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 723–767 (1995)
Spivey, M.J., Geng, J.J.: Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research 65, 235–241 (2001)
Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: Visual information and valid reasoning. In: Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, pp. 9–24. Mathematical Association of America (1991)
Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–100 (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Coppin, P. (2010). An Attention Based Theory to Explore the Cognitive Affordances of Diagrams Relative to Text . In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14599-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14600-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)