Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Checking Structural Integrity for Metadata Repository Systems by Means of Description Logics

  • Conference paper
Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6193))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

The organization of the metadata in repository systems exhibits a complex structure which is layered, multi-level and dynamically adaptable; it is insufficiently specified in existing repository system standard how to ensure structural integrity, the above two reasons lead to the violation of structural integrity frequently during the creation of the metadata structure based on Meta Object Facility(MOF), thus affect the stability of repository systems. However, structural integrity checking for repository systems based on MOF is difficult because MOF is rendered to users by graphs, which lack precise semantics. In this paper, we try to solve this problem by means of Description Logics (DLs). The approach is based on a particular formal logic of the family of Description Logics. We make a study of how to formalize the different levels of MOF architecture into the DL knowledge base and how to check inconsistencies automatically using query and reasoning mechanism provided by the Description Logic. We perform performance evaluation for structural integrity checking prototypical system implemented in terms of the approach, the results are encouraging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernstein, P., Dayal, U.: An overview of repository technology. In: 24th International Conference on Very Large Databases, pp. 705–713. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility Specification Version 2.0 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Franz, B., Diego, C., Deborah, M., Daniele, N., Peter, F.P.: The description logic handbook: Theory, implementation, and applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. University of Southern California. Loom Knowledge Representation System 4.0 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haarslev, V., Moller, R., Wessel, M.: RacerPro User’s Guide Version 2.0 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horrocks, I.: FaCT and iFaCT. In: International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 1999), pp. 133–135 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albertini, B., Rigo, S., Araujo, G., Araujo, C., Barros, E., Azevedo, W.: A computational reflection mechanism to support platform debugging in SystemC. In: 5th IEEE/ACM international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis (CODES+ISSS 2007), pp. 81–86. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenberg, A.D., Kiczales, G.: A simple edit-time metaobject protocol: controlling the display of metadata in programs. In: 21st ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA 2006), pp. 696–697. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Pirkelbauer, P., Solodkyy, Y., Stroustrup, B.: Open Multi-methods for C++. In: 6th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering, pp. 123–134. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishikawa, Y., Hori, A., Sato, M., Matsuda, M., Nolte, J., Tezuka, H., Konaka, H., Maeda, M., Kubota, K.: Design and Implementation of Metalevel Architecture in C++, MPC++ Approach. In: 1996 International Conference on Reflection, pp. 141–154 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bingham, E., Kuusisto, J., Lagus, K.: ICA and SOM in text document analysis. In: 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR 2002), pp. 361–362. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Coulson, G., Blair, G., Grace, P.: On the performance of reflective systems software. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Performance, Computing, and Communications, pp. 763–769. IEEE Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Petrov, I., Jablonski, S., Holze, M., Nemes, G., Schneider, M.: iRM: An OMG MOF Based Repository System with Querying Capabilities. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 850–851. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Black, A.P., Schärli, N., Ducasse, S.: Applying traits to the smalltalk collection classes. In: 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programing, systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA 2003), pp. 47–64. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Liau, C.-J.: A modal logic framework for multi-agent belief fusion. J. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) 6(1), 124–174 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Halpern, J.Y., Weissman, V.: Using First-Order Logic to Reason about Policies. J. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) 11(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emmerich, W., Finkelstein, A., Antonelli, S., Armitage, S., Stevens, R.: Managing standards compliance. J. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(6), 836–851 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simmonds, J.: Consistency maintenance of uml models with description logic. Master’s thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: Identification constraints and functional dependencies in description logics. In: 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G.: Expressive description logics. In: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications, pp. 178–218. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baader, F., Lutz, C.: Description Logic. In: The Handbook of Modal Logic, pp. 757–820. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Huang, Z. (2010). Checking Structural Integrity for Metadata Repository Systems by Means of Description Logics. In: Yoshikawa, M., Meng, X., Yumoto, T., Ma, Q., Sun, L., Watanabe, C. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6193. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14589-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14589-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14588-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14589-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics