Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Conceptual Framework for Ontology Based Automating and Merging of Clinical Pathways of Comorbidities

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Management for Health Care Procedures (K4HelP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5626))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 568 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we present a conceptual framework for ontology based knowledge representation and merging of Clinical Pathways (CP) of comorbidities. Paper based CP are static documents which do not have adaptability to accommodate dynamic changes in a patient’s conditions, particularly in case of co-morbidity, since most CP are focused on a single disease management. Our approach to computerize and merge CP of comorbidities for decision support purpose include; 1. Representation of comorbidity CP as OWL ontologies, 2. Merging ontologies along common tasks, 3. Execution of merged ontology using OWL reasoner to provide CP mediated decision support, 4. Evaluation of recommendations by instantiating the ontology with comorbidity scenarios. Most challenging and unique aspect of this research is that it involves the dynamic integration of computerized CP of two concurrent comorbid diseases, whilst maintaining clinical pragmatics and medical correctness. We believe that Semantic Web has enormous potential to achieve this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chu, S.: Reconceptualising clincal pathway system design. Collegian 8, 33–36 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearson, S., Goulart-Fisher, D., Lee, T.: Critical pathways as a strategy for improving care: Problems and potential. Annals of Internal Medicine 123, 941–948 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boxwala, A.A., Peleg, M., Tu, S., Ogunyemi, O., Zeng, Q., Wang, D., Patel, V.L., Greenes, R.A., Shortliffe, E.H.: Glif3: A representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 37, 147–161 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tu, S., Musen, M.: Modeling data and knowledge in the eon guideline architecture. In: Medinfo 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tu, S.W., Campbell, J., Musen, M.A.: The structure of guideline recommendations: A synthesis. In: Proc. AMIA Symposium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sutton, D., Fox, J.: The syntax and semantics of the proforma guideline modeling language. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10, 433–443 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abidi, S.: Ontology-based modeling of breast cancer follow-up clinical practice guideline for providing clinical decision support. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buchanan, B., Barstow, D., Bechtal, R., Bennett, J., Clancey, W., Kulikowski, C., Mitchell, T., Waterman, D.: Building Expert System. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, C., Hripcsak, G.: Natural language processing and its future in medicine: Can computers make sense out of natural language text. Academic Medicine 74, 890–895 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Glacer, B.: Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11, 93–155 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hitzler, P., Krotzsch, M., Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: What is ontology merging?–a category-theoretical perspective using pushouts. American Association of Artificial Intelligence, http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/phi/pub/cando05.pdf

  13. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fridman, N., Musen, M.: Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment, http://smi.stanford.edu/smi-web/reports/SMI-2000-0831.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abidi, S.R. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Ontology Based Automating and Merging of Clinical Pathways of Comorbidities. In: Riaño, D. (eds) Knowledge Management for Health Care Procedures. K4HelP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5626. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03262-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03262-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03261-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03262-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics