Abstract
Software development includes number of different type of meetings in the whole development process. The cognitive activities also play an important role in decision making activities in these meetings since they are carried out by human being. In this paper, we evaluated the relevance of meetings in different phases of the software development process with reference to cognitive aspects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leffingwell, D., Don, W.: Managing Software Requirements, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Robillard, P.N., Astus, P., Detienne, F., Visser, W.: Measuring Cognitive activities in software Engineering. In: Proc. of ICSE 1998, 20TH Int. Con. on Software Engineering, pp. 292–300 (1998)
Fagan, M.E.: Advances in software inspections. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 12(7), 744–751 (2000)
Gilb, T., Graham, D.: Software inspection. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (1993)
Laitenberger, O., Debaud, J.M.: An Encompassing Life Cycle Centric Survey of Software Inspection. The Journal of Software and Systems 50(1), 5–31 (2000)
Johnson, P.M., Tjahjono, D.: Does every inspection really need a meeting? Empirical Software Engineering 3, 3–35 (1998)
Porter, A., Johnson, P.: Assessing Software Review Meeting: Results of a Comparative Analysis of two Experimental Studies. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 23(3), 129–145 (1997)
Robillard, P.N.: The Role of Knowledge in Software. Communications of the ACM 42(1), 87–92 (1999)
Wang, Y.K.: Modern Software review: Techniques and Technologies. IRM Press, UK (2006)
http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3078 (last accessed, January 2009)
Sanderson, P.M., Fisher, C.: Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis: Foundations. Human Computer Interaction 9, 251–317 (1994)
Letovsky, S., Pinto, J., Lampert, R., Soloway, E.: A Cognitive Analysis of Code Inspection. In: Proc. Second workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, vol. 23, pp. 231–247. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood (1989)
Sauer, C., Jaffery, R.D., Land, L., Yetton, P.: The Effectiveness of Software Development Technical Reviews: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research. IEEE Trans. On Software Engineering 26(1), 114 (2000)
Vota, L.G.: Does every inspection need a meeting? ACM Software Engineering 18(5), 107–114 (1993)
Changxu, W., Yili, L.: Queuing Network Modeling of Driver Workload and Performance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 8(3), 528–537 (2007)
Hungerford, B.C., Alan, R.H., Collins, R.W.: Reviewing Software Diagrams: A Cognitive Study. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 30(2), 82–96 (2004)
Klemola, T.: Cognitive Model for Complexity Metrics (retrieved on 04 January 2009), http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/sahraouh/qaoose/papers/Klemola.pdf
Hughes, B., Cotterell, M.: Software Project Management, 4th edn., pp. 251–252. McGraw-Hill, New York (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Misra, S., Akman, I. (2009). A Cognitive Evaluation for Meetings in Software Development Process. In: Wen, P., Li, Y., Polkowski, L., Yao, Y., Tsumoto, S., Wang, G. (eds) Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. RSKT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5589. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02962-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02962-2_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02961-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02962-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)