Unexploited Resources in Interaction Design for Universal Access: People with Impairments as a Resource for Interaction Designers

1. Ohlsson, K., Persson, H., Östlin, O.: The Bollnäs’ model for testing, evaluation and design of information and communication technology services. Online Deliberation 2005 / DIAC 2005. Stanford University Stanford, Stanford (2005)

   Google Scholar 

2. ISO 13407, ISO 13407 Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. International Standard Organisation, Geneva (1999)

   Google Scholar 

3. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., Sundblad, Y.: Co-operative Design — perspectives on 20 years with the Scandinavian IT Design Model. Stockholm: Invited paper, NordiCHI 2000 conference, pp.1–10 (2000)

   Google Scholar 

4. Taxén, G., Druin, A., Fast, C., Kjellin, M.: KidStory: a technology design partnership with children. Behaviour and Information Technology, 119–125 (2001)

   Google Scholar 

5. Nielsen, J.: Guerrilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando (1994)

   Google Scholar 

6. Bevan, N.: Measuring usability as quality of use. In W. Harrison. Software Quality Journal 4(2), 115–130 (1995)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press Limited, London (1993)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

8. Ohlsson, K., Persson, H., Östlin, O.: The concept of Normality and its impact on design of Information and Communication Technology. In: Proceedings of the biannual Human Factors Network conference in Linköping. Linköpings University of Technology, Linköping (2006)

   Google Scholar 

9. Gregor, P., Newell, A.: Designing for dynamic diversity: making accessible interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on Universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly, pp. 90–92. ACM, New York (2001)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), World Health Organisation (2007), www.who.int/classifications/icf/en (retrieved November 20, 2007)

11. Eftring, H.: The Useworthiness of Robots for People with physical disabilities, Doctoral Dissertation. Certek, LTH, Lund (1999)

    Google Scholar 

12. Ericsson, K., Simon, H.: How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, & Activity 5(3), 178–186 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Lewis, C.: Using the thinking-aloud method in cognitive interface design, Report RC 9265. IBM Research, Yorktown Heights (1982)

    Google Scholar 

14. Lewis, C., Rieman, J.: Task-Centered User Interface Design - A Practical Introduction. Clayton Lewis and John Rieman as shareware, Boulder (1993)

    Google Scholar 

15. Wibeck, V.: Fokusgrupper. Studentliteratur, Lund (2000) (in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

16. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis, An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

17. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

18. Morgan, D.: The Focus Group Guidebook. Book 1. The Focus Group Kit. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

19. Eriksson, S.: Swedish Research Council. Codex, rules & guidlines for research (Januaruy 21, 2008) (2009), http://www.codex.vr.se/codex_eng/codex/index.html (retrieved February 24, 2009)

Download references