Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Decision Procedure for Detecting Atomicity Violations for Communicating Processes with Locks

  • Conference paper
Model Checking Software (SPIN 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5578))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a new decision procedure for detecting property violations in pushdown models for concurrent programs that use lock-based synchronization, where each thread’s lock operations are properly nested (à la synchronized methods in Java). The technique detects violations expressed as indexed phase automata (PAs)—a class of non-deterministic finite automata in which the only loops are self-loops.

Our interest in PAs stems from their ability to capture atomic-set serializability violations. (Atomic-set serializability is a relaxation of atomicity to only a user-specified set of memory locations.) We implemented the decision procedure and applied it to detecting atomic-set-serializability violations in models of concurrent Java programs. Compared with a prior method based on a semi-decision procedure, not only was the decision procedure 7.5X faster overall, but the semi-decision procedure timed out on about 68% of the queries versus 4% for the decision procedure.

Supported by NSF under grants CCF-0540955, CCF-0524051, and CCF-0810053, by AFRL under contract FA8750-06-C-0249, and by ONR under grant N00014-09-1-0510.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qadeer, S., Rehof, J.: Context-bounded model checking of concurrent software. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) TACAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 93–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Lal, A., Touili, T., Kidd, N., Reps, T.: Interprocedural analysis of concurrent programs under a context bound. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 282–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lal, A., Reps, T.: Reducing concurrent analysis under a context bound to sequential analysis. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Touili, T.: A generic approach to the static analysis of concurrent programs with procedures. In: POPL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaki, S., Clarke, E., Kidd, N., Reps, T., Touili, T.: Verifying concurrent message-passing C programs with recursive calls. In: Hermanns, H., Palsberg, J. (eds.) TACAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3920, pp. 334–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahlon, V., Ivancic, F., Gupta, A.: Reasoning about threads communicating via locks. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 505–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahlon, V., Gupta, A.: On the analysis of interacting pushdown systems. In: POPL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vaziri, M., Tip, F., Dolby, J.: Associating synchronization constraints with data in an object-oriented language. In: POPL (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flanagan, C., Qadeer, S.: A type and effect system for atomicity. In: PLDI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kidd, N., Reps, T., Dolby, J., Vaziri, M.: Finding concurrency-related bugs using random isolation. In: Jones, N.D., Müller-Olm, M. (eds.) VMCAI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5403, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Maler, O.: Reachability analysis of pushdown automata: Application to model checking. In: Mazurkiewicz, A., Winkowski, J. (eds.) CONCUR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1243, pp. 135–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Finkel, A., Willems, B.: A direct symbolic approach to model checking pushdown systems. Elec. Notes in Theor. Comp. Sci., vol. 9 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kidd, N., Lammich, P., Touili, T., Reps, T.: A decision procedure for detecting atomicity violations for communicating processes with locks. Technical Report 1649r, Univ. of Wisconsin (April 2009), http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wpis/abstracts/tr1649.abs.html

  14. Kidd, N., Lal, A., Reps, T.: Language strength reduction. In: Alpuente, M., Vidal, G. (eds.) SAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5079, pp. 283–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahlon, V., Gupta, A.: Personal communication (January 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwoon, S.: Model-Checking Pushdown Systems. PhD thesis, TUM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eytani, Y., Havelund, K., Stoller, S.D., Ur, S.: Towards a framework and a benchmark for testing tools for multi-threaded programs. Conc. and Comp. Prac. and Exp. 19(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reps, T.: Program analysis via graph reachability. Inf. and Softw. Tech. 40 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison, M.: Introduction to Formal Language Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Reps, T., Schwoon, S., Jha, S., Melski, D.: Weighted pushdown systems and their application to interprocedural dataflow analysis. SCP 58 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kidd, N., Lal, A., Reps, T.: WALi: The Weighted Automaton Library (February 2009), http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wpis/wpds/download.php

  22. BuDDy: A BDD package (July 2004), http://buddy.wiki.sourceforge.net/

  23. Bouajjani, A., Müller-Olm, M., Touili, T.: Regular symbolic analysis of dynamic networks of pushdown systems. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 473–487. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Lammich, P., Müller-Olm, M., Wenner, A.: Predecessor sets of dynamic pushdown networks with tree-regular constraints. In: CAV (2009) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kidd, N., Lammich, P., Touili, T., Reps, T. (2009). A Decision Procedure for Detecting Atomicity Violations for Communicating Processes with Locks. In: Păsăreanu, C.S. (eds) Model Checking Software. SPIN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5578. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02652-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02652-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02651-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02652-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics