Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Extending Anticipation Games with Location, Penalty and Timeline

  • Conference paper
Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5491))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Over the last few years, attack graphs have became a well recognized tool to analyze and model complex network attack. The most advanced evolution of attack graphs, called anticipation games, is based on game theory. However even if anticipation games allow to model time, collateral effects and player interactions with the network, there is still key aspects of the network security that cannot be modeled in this framework. Theses aspects are network cooperation to fight unknown attack, the cost of attack based on its duration and the introduction of new attack over the time. In this paper we address these needs, by introducing a three-fold extension to anticipation games. We prove that this extension does not change the complexity of the framework. We illustrate the usefulness of this extension by presenting how it can be used to find a defense strategy against 0 days that use an honey net. Finally, we have implemented this extension into a prototype, to show that it can be used to analyze large networks security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. J. ACM 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Myerson, R.B.: Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bursztein, E.: NetQi: A model checker for anticipation game. In: Cha, S(S.), Choi, J.-Y., Kim, M., Lee, I., Viswanathan, M. (eds.) ATVA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5311. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bursztein, E.: Using strategy objectives for network security analysis. In: 4th International Conferences on Information Security and Cryptology INSCRYPT. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bursztein, E., Goubault-Larrecq, J.: A logical framework for evaluating network resilience against faults and attacks. In: Cervesato, I. (ed.) ASIAN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4846, pp. 212–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dacier, M., Deswarte, Y., Kaaniche, M.: Models and tools for quantitative assessment of operational security. In: 12th International Information Security Conference, pp. 177–186 (May 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Henzinger, T., Majumdar, R., Stoelinga, M.: The element of surprise in timed games. In: Amadio, R., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 144–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Henzinger, T., Prabhu, V.: Timed alternating-time temporal logic. In: Asarin, E., Bouyer, P. (eds.) FORMATS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4202, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jha, S., Sheyner, O., Wing, J.: Two formal analysis of attack graphs. In: CSFW 2002: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW 2002), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 49–63. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lippmann, R., Webster, S., Stetson, D.: The Effect of Identifying Vulnerabilities and Patching Software on the Utility of Network Intrusion Detection. In: Wespi, A., Vigna, G., Deri, L. (eds.) RAID 2002. LNCS, vol. 2516, pp. 307–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lye, K.-w., Wing, J.M.: Game strategies in network security. Int. J. Inf. Sec. 4(1-2), 71–86 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahimkar, A., Shmatikov, V.: Game-based analysis of denial-of-service prevention protocols. In: 18th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW), Aix-en-Provence, France, pp. 287–301. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Noel, S., Jajodia, S.: Managing attack graph complexity through visual hierarchical aggregation. In: VizSEC/DMSEC 2004: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Visualization and data mining for computer security, pp. 109–118. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Noel, S., Jajodia, S., O’Berry, B., Jacobs, M.: Efficient Minimum-Cost Network Hardening Via Exploit Dependency Graphs. In: 19th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 86–95 (December 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ramakrishan, C., Sekar, R.: Model-based analysis of configuration vulnerabilities. Journal of Computer Security 1, 198–209 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rasmusen, E.: Games and Information. Blackwell publishing, Malden (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritchey, R.W., Ammann, P.: Using model checking to analyze network vulnerabilities. In: SP 2000: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 156–165. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shahriari, H.R., Jalili, R.: Modeling and analyzing network vulnerabilities via a logic-based approach

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sheyner, O., Haines, J., Jha, S., Lippmann, R., Wing, J.M.: Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs. In: SP 2002: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 273–284. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swiler, L.P.: A graph-based network-vulnerability analysis system. In: New Security Paradigms Workshop, pp. 71–79. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zerkle, D., Levitt, K.: Netkuang: a multi-host configuration vulnerability checker. In: SSYM 1996: Proceedings of the 6th conference on USENIX Security Symposium, Focusing on Applications of Cryptography, pp. 195–201. Usenix (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bursztein, E. (2009). Extending Anticipation Games with Location, Penalty and Timeline. In: Degano, P., Guttman, J., Martinelli, F. (eds) Formal Aspects in Security and Trust. FAST 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5491. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01465-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01465-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01464-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01465-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics