Abstract
In today’s business world, there exist multitudinous tools to model processes. For an automatic layout algorithm for those processes, it is important to take into account criteria like process flow and the semantic of the modeling notation. Most of the existing tools use standard layout approaches that often produce unsatisfying results since the calculated drawings are too dense and/or too large. This makes it difficult for users to understand the underlying process model.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brandes, U., Eiglsperger, M., Kaufmann, M., Wagner, D.: Sketch-driven orthogonal graph drawing. In: Goodrich, M.T., Kobourov, S.G. (eds.) GD 2002. LNCS, vol. 2528, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Siebenhaller, M., Kaufmann, M.: Drawing activity diagrams. Technical Report WSI-2006-02, Wilhelm-Schickard-Institute, University of Tübingen (2006)
White, S.A.: Introduction to bpmn (2004), http://www.bpmn.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Effinger, P., Kaufmann, M., Siebenhaller, M. (2009). Enhancing Visualizations of Business Processes. In: Tollis, I.G., Patrignani, M. (eds) Graph Drawing. GD 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5417. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00219-9_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00219-9_44
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00218-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00219-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)