Sharing the Architectural Knowledge of Quantitative Analysis

1. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software architecture in practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

   Google Scholar 

2. de Boer, R.C., Farenhorst, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H., Jansen, A.G.J.: Architectural knowledge: Getting to the core. In: Overhage, S., Szyperski, C.A., Reussner, R., Stafford, J.A. (eds.) QoSA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4880. pp. 197–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

3. Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Building up and reasoning about architectural knowledge. In: Hofmeister, C., Crnković, I., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4214. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

   Google Scholar 

4. Habli, I., Kelly, T.: Capturing and replaying architectural knowledge through derivational analogy. In: SHARK-ADI 2007: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on SHAring and Reusing architectural Knowledge Architecture, Rationale, and Design Intent, Washington, DC, USA, p. 4. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

   Google Scholar 

5. Lago, P., Avgeriou, P.: First workshop on sharing and reusing architectural knowledge. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 31(5), 32–36 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Clements, P., Rick Kazman, M.K.: Evaluating Software Architectures - Methods and Case Studies. The SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)

   Google Scholar 

7. Alliot, S.: A performance cost estimation model for large scale array signal processing system specification. In: Proc. of the Third International Samos Workshop on Synthesis, Architectures, and Simulation, pp. 156–160 (July 2003)

   Google Scholar 

8. Alliot, S., Nicolae, L., van Veelen., M.: A tool for exploring the large scale signal processing systems specifications. In: IEEE International conference on parallel computing in electrical engineering, pp. 341–348 (September 2004)

   Google Scholar 

9. de Vries, T., Jansen, A.G.J.: Knowledge architect excel plug-in technical report. Technical Report IWI preprint 2008-7-01, Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV The Netherlands (March 2008)

   Google Scholar 

10. Jansen, A.G.J., Bosch, J., Avergiou, P.: Documenting after the fact: recovering architectural design decisions. Journal of Systems and Software 81(4), 536–557 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. The Griffin project website, http://search.cs.rug.nl/Griffin

12. The Square Kilometre Array project website, http://www.skatelescope.org/

13. Babar, M.A., Gorton, I.: Comparison of scenario-based software architecture evaluation methods. In: Software Engineering Conference, 2004. 11th Asia-Pacific, 30 November-3 December, pp. 600–607 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

14. Dobrica, L., Niemela, E.: A survey on software architecture analysis methods. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(7), 638–653 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures, Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)

    Google Scholar 

16. Bengtsson, P., Lassing, N., Bosch, J., van Vliet, H.: Architecture-level modifiability analysis (ALMA). J. Syst. Softw. 69(1-2), 129–147 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Folmer, E., van Gurp, J., Bosch, J.: Software architecture analysis of usability. In: 9th IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 321–339 (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

18. Williams, L.G., Smith, C.U.: Pasa: a method for the performance assessment of software architectures. In: WOSP 2002: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Software and performance, Rome, Italy, pp. 179–189. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

19. Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Klein, M., Shelton, C.: Designing software architectures to achieve quality attribute requirements. IEE Proceedings - Software 152(4), 153–165 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Alliot, S., M.: Modelling and system design for the lofar station digital processing. In: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation, Modelling and System Engineering (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

21. Tang, A., Jin, Y., Han, J.: A rationale-based architecture model for design traceability and reasoning. Journal of Systems and Software 80(6), 918–934 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Babar, M.A., Gorton, I., Kitchenham, B.: A framework for supporting architecture knowledge and rationale management. In: Dutoit, A.H., McCall, R., Mistrík, I., Paech, B. (eds.) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, pp. 237–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

23. Capilla, R., Nava, F., Pérez, S., Dueñas, J.C.: A web-based tool for managing architectural design decisions. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 31(5) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

24. Farenhorst, R., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: Prerequisites for successful architectural knowledge sharing. In: ASWEC 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 Australian Software Engineering Conference, pp. 27–38. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references