Tomographic Dual Modality Breast Scanner

1. Niklason, L.T., et al.: Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205(2), 399–406 (1997)

   Google Scholar 

2. Wu, T., et al.: A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Med.Phys. 31(9), 2636–2647 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Mainprize, J.G., et al.: Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. Med.Phys. 33(9), 3159–3164 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Sechopoulos, I., et al.: Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med.Phys. 34(1), 221–232 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Boone, J.M., et al.: Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. Radiology 221(3), 657–667 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Ning, R., et al.: Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study. Med.Phys. 30(7), 1694–1705 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Crotty, D.J., McKinley, R.L., Tornai, M.P.: Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology 52(3), 603–616 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Weinberg, I.N., et al.: Positron emission mammography: high-resolution biochemical breast imaging. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 4(1), 55–60 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

9. Smith, M.F., et al.: Positron emission mammography with tomographic acquisition using dual planar detectors: initial evaluations. Physics in Medicine & Biology 49(11), 2437–2452 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Doshi, N.K., et al.: Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. Medical.Physics 27(7), 1535–1543 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Raylman, R.R., et al.: The potential role of positron emission mammography for detection of breast cancer. A phantom study. Medical Physics 27(8), 1943–1954 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

12. Thompson, C.J., et al.: Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. Medical Physics 21(4), 529–538 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. More, M.J., et al.: Evaluation of Gamma Cameras for Use in Dedicated Breast Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 53(5), 2675–2679 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Hruska, C.B., O’Connor, M.K.: Effect of Collimator Selection on Tumor Detection for Dedicated Nuclear Breast Imaging Systems. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 53(5), 2680–2689 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Stebel, L., et al.: A modular prototype detector for scintimammography imaging. In: Conference Record IEEE TNS/MIC, vol. 5, pp. 3027–3031 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

16. Pani, R., et al.: Imaging characteristics comparison of compact pixellated detectors for scintimammography. In: Conference Record IEEE TNS/MIC, vol. 6, pp. 3748–3751 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

17. Cinti, M.N., et al.: Tumor SNR analysis in scintimammography by dedicated high contrast imager. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 50(5), 1618–1623 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Williams, M.B., et al.: Combined structural and functional imaging of the breast. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 1(1), 39–42 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

19. Williams, M.B., et al.: Phantom study of radiotracer concentration quantification in breast scintigraphy. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 50(3), 433–438 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. More, M.J., et al.: Limited Angle Dual Modality Breast Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 54(3), 504–513 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Dobbins, J.T., Godfrey, D.J.: Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. [Review] [110 refs]. Physics in Medicine & Biology 48(19), R65–R106 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Williams, M.B., et al.: Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography. Med.Phys. 26(11), 2273–2285 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Williams, M.B., et al.: Analysis of position-dependent Compton scatter in scintimammography with mild compression, vol. 2, pp. 863–867 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

24. Heng, L., et al.: Lesion Quantification in Dual-Modality Mammotomography. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 54(1), 107–115 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Williams, M.B., et al.: Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Med. Phys. 35(6), 2414–2424 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references