Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Extraction of Maximum Support Rules for the Root Cause Analysis

  • Chapter
Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 132))

Summary

Rule extraction for root cause analysis in manufacturing process optimization is an alternative to traditional approaches to root cause analysis based on process capability indices and variance analysis. Process capability indices alone do not allow to identify those process parameters which have the major impact on quality since these indices are only based on measurement results and do not consider the explaining process parameters. Variance analysis is subject to serious constraints concerning the data sample used in the analysis. In this work a rule search approach using Branch and Bound principles is presented, considering both the numerical measurement results and the nominal process factors. This combined analysis allows to associate the process parameters with the measurement results and therefore to identify the main drivers for quality deterioration of a manufacturing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Kalyanasundaram, S. Balamurali. Bootstrap lower confidence limits for the process capability indices c p , c pk and c pm . International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 19:1088–1097, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.F. Bissel. How reliable is your capability index. Applied Statistics, 39(3):331–340, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Efron, R.J. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G.S. Wasserman, L.A Franklin. Bootstrap lower confidence limits for capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(4):196–210, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Urban Hjorth. Computer Intensive Statistical Methods, 1st edition. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kotz, N.L. Johanson. Process capability indices – a review, 1992–2000. Journal of Quality Technology, 34(1): 2–19, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas C. Montgomery. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Pearn, K. Chen. Capability indices for non-normal distributions with an application in electrolytic capacitor manufacturing. Microelectronics Reliability, 37:1853–1858, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Vännman. A unified approach to capability indices. Statistica Sina, 5:805–820, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G.A. Stenback, D.M. Wardrop, N.F. Zhang. Interval estimation of process capability index c p k. Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods, 19(12):4455–4470, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hrycej, T., Strobel, C.M. (2008). Extraction of Maximum Support Rules for the Root Cause Analysis. In: Prokhorov, D. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79256-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79257-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics