Abstract
The Higher Education (HE) sector has gained remarkable economic importance worldwide. There is a huge amount of institutions competing in this dynamically evolving market. Emerging concepts like new public management advise to organize HE institutions as autonomous business units that can easily be adapted to market changes. In this context, methods of performance-based funding play an important role in governing the institutions both from an external and internal perspective. However, the right choice of indicators measuring the performance turns out to be a vital factor for the success of these budgeting methods. Wrongly chosen, they may even be misleading. Whereas most studies in this field suggest particular measurement systems, our focus of research is to provide a methodology for the design of individual measurement systems. As part of this method, techniques from reference modeling can be applied in order to reuse typical measures for special situations and then further adopt and extend them. In this paper, we study the modeling language H2 which may serve as an essential part of such a methodology. We conclude with an outlook on further research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hüfner, K.: Governance and Funding of Higher Education in Germany. Higher Education in Europe 28(2), 145–163 (2003)
Johnstone, D.B., Arora, A., Experton, W.: The Financing and Management of Higher Education: A Status Report on Worldwide Reforms. State University of New York at Buffalo (1998)
Liefner, I.: Funding, Resource Allocation, and Performance in Higher Education Systems. Higher Education 46(4), 469–489 (2003)
Ziegele, F.: Financial Autonomy of Higher Education Institutions: The Necessity and Design of an Institutional Framework. für Hochschulentwicklung, C., (ed.) Working Paper No. 17. Gütersloh (1998)
Ziegele, F.: Formelgebundene Budgetzuweisung und Zielvereinbarungen. Cordes, J., Roland, F., Westermann, G. (eds.): Hochschulmanagement – Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte der Hochschulsteuerung. Wiesbaden (2001) 189-205
Becker, J., Niehaves, B.: Epistemological Perspectives on IS Research – A Framework for Analyzing and Systematizing Epistemological Assumptions. Information Systems Journal 17(2), 197–214 (2007)
Kreysing, M.: Autonomy, Accountability, and Organizational Complexity in Higher Education: The Goettingen Model of University Reform. Journal of Educational Administration 40(6), 552–560 (2002)
Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G.: Public Management Reform – A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford (2004)
Tsichritzis, D.: Reengineering the University. Communications of the ACM 42(6), 93–100 (1999)
Allen, D.K., Fifield, N.: Re-engineering Change in Higher Education. Information Research, Vol 4(3) [2007-06-01] (1999), http://informationr.net/ir/4-3/paper56.html
Huisman, J.: Higher Education in Germany. In: CHEPS (Center for Higher Education Policy Studies), country report. Enschede (2003)
Jaeger, M.: Leistungsorientierte Budgetierung: Analyse der Umsetzung an ausgewählten Universitäten und Fakultäten/Fachbereichen. Hochschul-Informationssystem (ed.), Kurzinformation A1. Hannover (2006)
Vroom, V. H.: Work and Motivation. New York, London, Sydney (1964)
Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E.: Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood (1968)
Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E., Hackman, J.R.: Behaviour in Organisations. New York (1975)
Ziegele, F.: Das Zusammenwirken von formelgebundener Mittelzuweisung und Zielvereinbarung. In: Das Präsidium der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (ed.): Globalhaushalt in Niedersachsen – Erfahrungen, Beurteilungen, Perspektiven. Hochschulentwicklungsplanung, Oldenburg, vol. 41, pp.175-188 (1999)
Ziegele, F.: Indikatorengestützte Mittelvergabe. In: Hanft, A. (ed.): Grundbegriffe des Hochschulmanagements. Bielefeld, pp. 195-201 (2004)
Berens, W., Hoffjan, A.: Controlling in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Grundlagen, Fallstudien, Lösungen. Stuttgart (2004)
Körber-Weik, M.: Indikatorsteuerungen – Durch neue Finanzierungsformeln zu besseren Hochschulen und wirksamerer Frauenförderung. In: Roloff, C. (ed.) Reformpotential an Hochschulen. Frauen als Akteurinnen in Hochschulreformprozessen, Berlin, pp. 153–178 (1998)
Frank, U.: Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information Systems Discipline – Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges. In: Haseman, W.D., Nazareth, D.L., Goodhue, D.L. (eds.) AMCIS 1999. Proceedings of the 5th America’s Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, pp. 695–697 (1999)
vom Brocke, J.: Design Principles for Reference Modeling: Reusing Information Models by Means of Aggregation, Specialization, Instantiation, and Analogy. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.): Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, 47–75 (2007)
Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Knackstedt, R.: Adaptive Reference Modeling. Integrating Configurative and Generic Adaptation Techniques for Information Models. In: Becker, J., Delfmann, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling. Efficient Information Systems Design Through Reuse of Information Models, Berlin, pp. 23–49 (2007)
Becker, J., Janiesch, C., Pfeiffer, D., Seidel, S.: Evolutionary Method Engineering – Towards a Method for the Analysis and Conception of Management Information Systems. In: AMCIS 2006. Proceedings of the 12th America’s Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, pp. 3922–3933 (2006)
Delfmann, P., Janiesch, C., Knackstedt, R., Rieke, T., Seidel, S.: Towards Tool Support for Configurative Reference Modeling – Experiences from a Meta Modeling Teaching Case. In: WoMM 2006. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Meta-Modelling and Ontologies, Lecture Notes in Informatics, Karlsruhe, pp. 61–83 (2006)
Holten, R.: The MetaMIS Approach for the Specification of Management Views on Business Processes. Department for Information Systems, University of Munster (ed.), Working Paper No. 84. Munster (2001)
Holten, R., Dreiling, A.: Specification of Fact Calculations within the MetaMIS Approach. Department for Information Systems, University of Munster (ed.), Working Paper No. 88. Munster (2002)
Brüggemeier, M.: Controlling. In: Hanft, A. (ed.) Grundbegriffe des Hochschulmanagements, Bielefeld, pp. 58–67 (2004)
Schütte, R.: Guidelines for Reference Modeling. Wiesbaden (1998)
van der Aaalst, W.M.P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: BPRM 2005. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models, Nancy (2005)
Küpper, H.: Management Mechanism and Financing of Higher Education in Germany. Higher Education Management and Policy 15, 71–89 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
vom Brocke, J., Buddendick, C., Simons, A. (2008). Reference Modeling for Higher Education Budgeting: Applying the H2 Toolset for Conceptual Modeling of Performance-Based Funding Systems. In: ter Hofstede, A., Benatallah, B., Paik, HY. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4928. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_44
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78237-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78238-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)