Abstract
Semantic inference is an important component in many natural language understanding applications. Classical approaches to semantic inference rely on logical representations for meaning, which may be viewed as being “external” to the natural language itself. However, practical applications usually adopt shallower lexical or lexical-syntactic representations, which correspond closely to language structure. In many cases, such approaches lack a principled meaning representation and inference framework. We describe a generic semantic inference framework that operates directly on language-based structures, particularly syntactic trees. New trees are inferred by applying entailment rules, which provide a unified representation for varying types of inferences. Rules were generated by manual and automatic methods, covering generic linguistic structures as well as specific lexical-based inferences. Initial empirical evaluation in a Relation Extraction setting supports the validity and potential of our approach. Additionally, such inference is shown to improve the critical step of unsupervised learning of entailment rules, which in turn enhances the scope of the inference system.
This paper corresponds to the invited talk of the first author at CICLING 2008.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 177–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Dolan, B., Ferro, L., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Szpektor, I.: The second pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In: Second PASCAL Challenge Workshop for Recognizing Textual Entailment (2006)
Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., Dolan, B.: The third pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing (2007)
Raina, R., Ng, A.Y., Manning, C.D.: Robust textual inference via learning and abductive reasoning. In: Proceedings of AAAI (2005)
Tatu, M., Moldovan, D.: A logic-based semantic approach to recognizing textual entailment. In: Proceedings of COLING-ACL (2006)
Bos, J., Markert, K.: When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesn’t). In: Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment (2006)
Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Greental, I., Shnarch, E.: Semantic inference at the lexical-syntactic level. In: Proceedings of AAAI (2007)
Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Greental, I., Szpektor, I., Friedman, M.: Semantic inference at the lexical-syntactic level for textual entailment recognition. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing (2007)
Valencia, V.S.: Parsing-driven inference: natural logic. Linguistic Analysis 25, 258–285 (1995)
MacCartney, B., Manning, C.D.: Natural logic for textual inference. In: Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, pp. 193–200, Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)
Szpektor, I., Dagan, I.: Learning canonical forms of entailment rules. In: Proceedings of RANLP (2007)
Lin, D.: Dependency-based evaluation of minipar. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems at LREC (1998)
Nairn, R., Condoravdi, C., Karttunen., L.: Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In: Proceedings of ICoS-5 (2006)
Ron, T.: Generating entailment rules using online lexical resources. Masterś thesis, Computer Science Department, BarIlan University (2006)
Macleod, C., Grishman, R., Meyers, A., Barrett, L., Reeves, R.: Nomlex: A lexicon of nominalizations. In: EURALEX (1998)
Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Language Engineering 7(4), 343–360 (2001)
Szpektor, I., Tanev, H., Dagan, I., Coppola, B.: Scaling web-based acquisition of entailment relations. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2004)
Ravichandran, D., Hovy, E.: Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In: Proceedings of ACL (2002)
Shinyama, Y., Sekine, S., Kiyoshi, S., Grishman, R.: Automatic paraphrase acquisition from news articles. In: Proceedings of HLT (2002)
Barzilay, R., Lee, L.: Learning to paraphrase: An unsupervised approach using multiple-sequence alignment. In: Proceedings of HLT-NAACL (2003)
Quirk, C., Brockett, C., Dolan, W.: Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2004)
Sekine, S.: Automatic paraphrase discovery based on context and keywords between ne pairs. In: Proceedings of IWP (2005)
Romano, L., Kouylekov, M., Szpektor, I., Dagan, I., Lavelli, A.: Investigating a generic paraphrase-based approach for relation extraction. In: Proceedings of EACL (2006)
Sekine, S.: On-demand information extraction. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL Main Conference Poster Sessions (2006)
Harabagiu, S., Hickl, A.: Methods for using textual entailment in open-domain question answering. In: Proceedings of ACL (2006)
Szpektor, I., Shnarch, E., Dagan, I.: Instance-based evaluation of entailment rule acquisition. In: Proceedings of ACL (2007)
Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46 (1960)
Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Language, Speech and Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dagan, I., Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., Greental, I., Shnarch, E. (2008). Natural Language as the Basis for Meaning Representation and Inference. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4919. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78134-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78135-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)