Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Linking Data to Ontologies

  • Conference paper
Journal on Data Semantics X

Abstract

Many organizations nowadays face the problem of accessing existing data sources by means of flexible mechanisms that are both powerful and efficient. Ontologies are widely considered as a suitable formal tool for sophisticated data access. The ontology expresses the domain of interest of the information system at a high level of abstraction, and the relationship between data at the sources and instances of concepts and roles in the ontology is expressed by means of mappings. In this paper we present a solution to the problem of designing effective systems for ontology-based data access. Our solution is based on three main ingredients. First, we present a new ontology language, based on Description Logics, that is particularly suited to reason with large amounts of instances. The second ingredient is a novel mapping language that is able to deal with the so-called impedance mismatch problem, i.e., the problem arising from the difference between the basic elements managed by the sources, namely data, and the elements managed by the ontology, namely objects. The third ingredient is the query answering method, that combines reasoning at the level of the ontology with specific mechanisms for both taking into account the mappings and efficiently accessing the data at the sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison Wesley Publ. Co, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Acciarri, A., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Palmieri, M., Rosati, R.: QuOnto: Querying ontologies. In: AAAI 2005. Proc. of the 20th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1670–1671 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: IJCAI 2005. Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 364–369 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrasa, J., Corcho, O., Gomez-Perez, A.: R2O, an extensible and semantically based database-to-ontology mapping language. In: WebDB 2004. Proc. of the 7th Int. Workshop on the Web and Databases (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: DL-Lite: Tractable description logics for ontologies. In: AAAI 2005. Proc. of the 20th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 602–607 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Data complexity of query answering in description logics. In: KR 2006. Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 260–270 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family. J. of Automated Reasoning (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Data integration in data warehousing. Int. J. of Cooperative Information Systems 10(3), 237–271 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. J. of Logic and Computation 4(4), 423–452 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Goasdoue, F., Lattes, V., Rousset, M.-C.: The use of CARIN language and algorithms for information integration: The Picsel system. Int. J. of Cooperative Information Systems 9(4), 383–401 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: Combining logic programs with description logic. In: WWW 2003. Proc. of the 12th Int. World Wide Web Conf, pp. 48–57 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heflin, J., Hendler, J.: A portrait of the Semantic Web in action. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 54–59 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From \(\mathcal{SHIQ}\) and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. J. of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hull, R.: A survey of theoretical research on typed complex database objects. In: Paredaens, J. (ed.) Databases, pp. 193–256. Academic Press, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hull, R., Yoshikawa, M.: ILOG: Declarative creation and manipulation of object identifiers. In: VLDB 1990. Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 455–468 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Data complexity of reasoning in very expressive description logics. In: IJCAI 2005. Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 466–471 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Komorowski, H.J.: A specification of an abstract Prolog machine and its application to partial evaluation. Technical Report LSST 69, Linköping University (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In: PODS 2002. Proc. of the 21st ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 233–246 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lloyd, J.W.: Foundations of Logic Programming, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lloyd, J.W., Shepherdson, J.C.: Partial evaluation in logic programming. J. of Logic Programming 11, 217–242 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lutz, C.: Description logics with concrete domains: A survey. In: Balbiani, P., Suzuki, N.-Y., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logics, vol. 4, King’s College Publications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mädche, A., Motik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: MAFRA – a mapping framework for distributed ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 235–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meseguer, J., Qian, X.: A logical semantics for object-oriented databases. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 89–98 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Minker, J.: A logic-based approach to data integration. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 2(3), 293–321 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Ortiz, M.M., Calvanese, D., Eiter, T.: Characterizing data complexity for conjunctive query answering in expressive description logics. In: AAAI 2006. Proc. of the 21st Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Poggi, A.: Structured and Semi-Structured Data Integration. PhD thesis, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma La Sapienza (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reiter, R.: On closed world data bases. In: Gallaire, H., Minker, J. (eds.) Logic and Databases, pp. 119–140. Plenum Publ. Co, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scharffe, F., de Bruijn, J.: A language to specify mappings between ontologies. In: SITIS 2005. Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems, pp. 267–271 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Serafini, L., Tamilin, A.: DRAGO: Distributed reasoning architecture for the Semantic Web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 361–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vardi, M.Y.: The complexity of relational query languages. In: STOC 1982. Proc. of the 14th ACM SIGACT Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 137–146 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stefano Spaccapietra

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poggi, A., Lembo, D., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R. (2008). Linking Data to Ontologies. In: Spaccapietra, S. (eds) Journal on Data Semantics X. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4900. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77688-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77688-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77687-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77688-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics