Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4803))

Abstract

In this paper we present the r 3 ontology, a foundational ontology for reactive rules, aiming at coping with language heterogeneity at the rule (component) level. This (OWL-DL) ontology is at a low (structural) abstraction level thus fostering its extension. Although focusing on reactive rules (reactive derivation rules not excluded), the r 3 ontology defines a vocabulary that allows also for the definition of rule (component) languages to model other types of rules like production, integrity, or logical derivation rules.

This research has been funded by the European Commission within the 6th Framework Programme project REWERSE number 506779.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alferes, J.J., Amador, R., Behrends, E., Bry, F., Eckert, M., Franco, T., Fritzen, O., Grallert, H., Knabke, T., Krippahl, L., May, W., Pătrânjan, P L., Schenk, F., Schubert, D.: Completion of the prototype scenario. I5-D7, CENTRIA, Universidade Nova de Lisboa  (2007), http://rewerse.net/deliverables.html

  2. Alferes, J.J., Amador, R., Behrends, E., Fritzen, O., Knabke, T., May, W., Schenk, F., Schubert, D.: Reactive rule ontology: RDF/OWL level. I5-D6, CENTRIA, Universidade Nova de Lisboa  (2007), http://rewerse.net/deliverables.html

  3. Alferes, J.J., Banti, F., Brogi, A.: An Event-Condition-Action Logic Programming Language. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alferes, J.J., Brogi, A., Leite, J.A., Pereira, L.M.: An evolvable rule-based e-mail agent. In: Pires, F.M., Abreu, S.P. (eds.) EPIA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2902, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angele, J., Boley, H., de Bruijn, J., Fensel, D., Hitzler, P., Kifer, M., Krummenacher, R., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., Studer, R.: Web Rule Language (WRL). In: W3C,(submission) http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/SUBM-WRL-20050909/ (September 2005)

  6. Behrends, E., Fritzen, O., May, W., Schenk, F.: Combining ECA Rules with Process Algebras for the Semantic Web. In: RuleML 2006, IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boley, H., Grosof, B., Sintek, M., Tabet, S., Wagner, G.: RuleML Design. RuleML Initiative  (August 2006), http://www.ruleml.org/

  8. Boley, H., Kifer, M.: RIF Core Design. Working Draft, W3C (August 2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-core-20070330

  9. Bonifati, A., Braga, D., Campi, A., Ceri, S.: Active XQuery. In: ICDE 2002, IEEE, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bry, F., Eckert, M.: Rule-Based Composite Event Queries: The Language XChangeEQ and its Semantics. In: RR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4524, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bry, F., Eckert, M., Pătrânjan, P.-L., Romanenko, I.: Realizing Business Processes with ECA Rules: Benefits, Challenges, Limits. In: Alferes, J.J., Bailey, J., May, W., Schwertel, U. (eds.) PPSWR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4187, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, W., Kifer, M., Warren, D.S.: HILOG: A Foundation for Higher-Order Logic Programming. Journal of Logic Programming 15(3), 187–230 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C  (2004)(submission), http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/

  14. International Organization for Standardization. Common Logic (CL): a framework for a family of logic-based languages, volume ISO/IEC FDIS 24707. ISO (May 2007), http://common-logic.org/

  15. Knolmayer, G., Endl, R., Pfahre, M.: Modeling processes and workflows by business rules. In: Business Process Management, Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. May, W., Alferes, J.J., Amador, R.: Active rules in the Semantic Web: Dealing with language heterogeneity. In: Adi, A., Stoutenburg, S., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2005. LNCS, vol. 3791, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. May, W., Alferes, J.J., Amador, R.: An ontology- and resources-based approach to evolution and reactivity in the Semantic Web. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) ODBASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3761, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group. Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR). OMG August (2006), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/2006-08-05

  19. Papamarkos, G., Poulovassilis, A., Wood, P.T.: Event-condition-action rules on RDF metadata in P2P environments. Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking 50(10), 1513–1532 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Seiriö, M., Berndtsson, M.: Design and implementation of an eca rule markup language. In: Adi, A., Stoutenburg, S., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2005. LNCS, vol. 3791, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spreeuwenberg, S., Gerrits, R.: Business Rules in the Semantic Web, Are There Any or Are They Different? In: Barahona, P., Bry, F., Franconi, E., Henze, N., Sattler, U. (eds.) Reasoning Web. LNCS, vol. 4126, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. MARS: Modular Active Rules for the Semantic Web. DBIS, Institute for Informatics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. http://rewerse.net/I5/MARS/

  23. Resourceful Reactive Rules(r 3). CENTRIA, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, http://rewerse.net/I5/r3/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert Meersman Zahir Tari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alferes, J.J., Amador, R. (2007). r3– A Foundational Ontology for Reactive Rules. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS. OTM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_62

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76846-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76848-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics