Abstract
In this paper, we propose a methodology for managing database evolutions by exploiting two ontologies. The first ontology describes the changes occurring in a database application. The second one aims at characterizing techniques and tools useful for database change management. We propose an algorithm performing ontologies matching and its application to identify appropriate techniques and tools for a given database change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cremer, K., Marburger, A., Westfechtel, B.: Graph-Based Tools for Re-engineering. Journal of software maintenance and evolution: research and practice 14, 257–292 (2002)
Lientz, B.P., Swanson, E.B.: Distributed Systems Development and Maintenance. In: Akoka, J. (ed.) Management of Distributed Data Processing, North-Holland, Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1982)
Chapin, N., Hale, J., Khan, K., Ramil, J., Than, W.G.: Types of Software Evolution and Software Maintenance. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution (2001)
Mens, T., Buckley, J., Zenger, M., Rashid, A.: Towards a Taxonomy of Software Evolution, USE03. In: 2nd International Workshop on Unanticipated Software Evolution, in conjunction with ETAPS 2003, Warsaw (2003)
Felici, M.: Taxonomy of Evolution and Dependability, USE03. In: 2nd International Workshop on Unanticipated Software Evolution, in conjunction with ETAPS 2003, Warsaw (2003)
Comyn-Wattiau, I., Akoka, J., Lammari, N.: A Framework for Database Evolution Management, USE03. In: 2nd International Workshop on Unanticipated Software Evolution, in conjunction with ETAPS 2003, Warsaw (2003)
Davidson, S., Buneman, P., Kosky, A.: Semantics of Database Transformations. In: Libkin, L., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Semantics in Databases 1995. LNCS, vol. 1358, Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.: A comparative Analysis of methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Survey Journal 18(4) (1986)
Kim, W., Choi, I., Gala, S., Scheeval, M.: On Resolving Schematic Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems. In: Modern Database Systems, ACM Press, New York (1995)
Kashyap, V., Sheth, A.: Semantic and Schematic Similarities Between DataBase Objects: A context-based Approach. VLDB journal 5(4) (1996)
Miller, R.J., Ioannidis, Y.E., Ramakrishan, R.: Schema Equivalence in heterogeneous Systems: Bridging Theory and Practice. Information System Journal 19(1) (1994)
Biskup, J., Convent, B.: A formal View Integration Method. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Washington (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lammari, N., Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I. (2003). Supporting Database Evolution: Using Ontologies Matching. In: Konstantas, D., Léonard, M., Pigneur, Y., Patel, S. (eds) Object-Oriented Information Systems. OOIS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2817. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45242-3_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45242-3_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40860-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45242-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive