Scenario-Based Application Requirements Engineering

1. Atkinson, C., Bayer, J., Bunse, C., Kamsties, E., Laitenberger, O., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Paech, B., Wüst, J., Zettel, J.: Component-Based Product-Line Engineering with UML (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2002)

   Google Scholar 

2. Bachmann, F., Goedicke, M., Leite, J., Nord, R., Pohl, K., Ramesh, B., Vilbig, A.: An International. WoMeta-Model for Representing Variability in Product Family Development, In: 5th International Work-shop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5), Siena, Italy, 2003, pp 66-80

   Google Scholar 

3. Ben Achour, C. et al: Bridging the gap between users and requirements engineering: the scenario-based ap-proach. Int. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 14(6), 379-405 (1999)

   Google Scholar 

4. Beuche, D.: Composition and construction of embedded software families. PhD thesis (University of Marburg, Magdeburg, Germany 2003)

   Google Scholar 

5. Böckle, G., Wittmann, M.: Catalogue of methods and processes for system-family engineering, Offi -cial Web site of the FAMILIES project . http : / /www .esi .es /Families /E 1 . 4 b -Method -Catalogue / Start_SFE_Catalogue.htm. Cited 8 Aug 2005

6. Bühne, S., Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: Why is it not sufficient to model requirements variability with feature models? In: Proceedings of Workshop: Automotive Requirements Engineering (AURE04), co-located at RE04, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan, 2004, pp 5-12

   Google Scholar 

7. Bühne, S., Halmans, G., Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: An extended and partially validated method to identify cus-tomer specific requirements for product family based applications, FAMILIES project, deliverable for task E2.2.2 (June 2004)

   Google Scholar 

8. Bühne, S., Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K.: Modeling requirements variability across product lines. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Paris, France, ed by Atlee, J.M. (IEEE, New York 2005) pp 41-50

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Carroll, J.: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions (MIT, Cambridge, MA 2000)

   Google Scholar 

10. Cerón, R., Dueñas, J.C., Serrano, E., Capilla, R.: A meta-model for requirements engineering in system fam-ily context for software process improvement using CMMI. In: 6th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Oulu, Finland, 13-18 June 2005, ed by Frank, B., Seija, K.S. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3547 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005)

    Google Scholar 

11. Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines - Practices and Patterns. Series in Software Engi-neering (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 2001)

    Google Scholar 

12. Deelstra, S., Sinnemaand, M., Bosch, J.: Experiences in software product families: problems and issues dur-ing product derivation. In: Software Product Lines, ed by Nord, R.L., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference (SPLC 2004), Boston, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3154 (Springer, Berlin Hei-delberg New York 2004) pp 165-182

    Google Scholar 

13. Dorfman, M., Thayer, R.H.: Software Requirements Engineering (IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, MD 1977)

    Google Scholar 

14. International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for System Families: Position papers, ed by Dueñas, J.C., Schmid, K., allocated with ICSR8, July 2004, Madrid. Technical report (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid 2004)

    Google Scholar 

15. Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M.: A framework for multi-valued reasoning over inconsistent viewpoints. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering 2001 (ICSE 2001), 2001, pp 411-420

    Google Scholar 

16. Faulk, S.R.: Product-line requirements specification (PRS): an approach and case study. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Canada (IEEE, New York 2001) pp 48-55

    Google Scholar 

17. Halmans, G., Pohl, K.: Considering product line assets when defining customer requirements. In: Proceed-ings of the International Workshop on Product line Engineering: The Early Steps: Planning, Modeling, and Managing (PLEES’01), Erfurt, Germany, 2001, pp 37-42

    Google Scholar 

18. Halmans, G., Pohl, K.: Communicating the variability of a software-product line to customers. J. Softw. Syst. Model. (SoSyM) 2: 15-36 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Hotz, L., Krebs, T.: Supporting the product derivation process with a knowledge-based approach. In: Pro-ceedings of the International Workshop on Software Variability Management (SVM), co-located at ICSE 03, Portland, USA, 2003, pp 24-29

    Google Scholar 

20. Hotz, L., Günter, A., Krebs, T.: A knowledge-based product derivation process and some ideas how to in-tegrate product development. In: Proceedings of the Software Variability Management Workshop, Gronin-gen, Netherlands, 2003, ed by Vangurp, J., Bosch, J., pp 136-140

    Google Scholar 

21. IEEE: IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications, IEEE Standard 830-1998 (The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York 1998)

    Google Scholar 

22. John, I., Muthig, D.: Tailoring use cases for product line modelling. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines 2002 (REPL’02), 2002, pp 26-32

    Google Scholar 

23. Kang, K., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., Huh, M.: FORM: a feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Ann. Softw. Eng. 5: 143-168 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.: Attractive quality and must be quality. In: The Best on Quality, ed by Hromi, J.D., vol 7(ASQ Quality, Milwaukee, WI 1996)

    Google Scholar 

25. Karlsson, E.A.: Software Reuse - A Holistic Approach (Wiley, New York 1995)

    Google Scholar 

26. Lam, W.: A case-study of requirements reuse through product families. Ann. Softw. Eng. 5: 253-277 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Lee, K., Kang, K.C., Koh, E., Chae, W., Kim, B., Choi, B.W.: Domain-oriented engineering of elevator control software. In: Software Product Lines, Experience and Research Directions, ed by Donohoe, P., Pro-ceedings of the First Software Product Line Conference (SPLC1), Denver, Colorado, vol 576 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2000) pp 3-22

    Google Scholar 

28. Mannion, M., Kaindl, H., Wheadon, J., Keepence, B.: Reusing single system requirements from applica-tion family requirements. In Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 16-22 May 1999, ICSE (IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, MD) pp 453-462

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

29. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

30. Pohl, K.: Process-Centered Requirements Engineering (Research Studies Press, Wiley, New York 1996)

    Google Scholar 

31. Project Website of the DFG project VarMod-PRIME: variability modeling in process integrated modeling environments. http://www.sse.uni-essen.de/wms/en/index.php?go=139

32. Schmid, K., John, I.: Generic variability management and its application to product line modeling. In: Proceed-ings of the Software Variability Management Workshop, Groningen, Netherlands, ed by Van Gurp, J. Bosch, J., pp 13-18

    Google Scholar 

33. Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P.: Requirements Engineering - A Good Practice Guide (Wiley, New York 2000)

    Google Scholar 

34. van der Linden, F.: Software product lines in Europe: the ESAPS & CAF É projects. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 41-49 (July/August 2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

35. Weiss, D.M., Lai, C.T.R.: Software Product-Line Engineering, A Family-Based Software Development Proc-ess (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA 1999)

    Google Scholar 

36. Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., Haumer, P.: Scenario usage in system development: a report on current practice. IEEE Softw. 15(2), 34-45 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Wolter, K., Krebs, T., Hotz, L., Meijler, T.D.: Knowledge-based product derivation process. In: Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, ed by Bramer, M., Devedzic, V., IFIP 18th World Computer Con-gress, TC12 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations (AIAI-2004) (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2004) pp 323-332

    Google Scholar 

Download references